Formica Francesco, Ferro Orazio, Brustia Matteo, Corti Fabrizio, Colagrande Luisa, Bosisio Enrica, Paolini Giovanni
Cardiac Surgery Clinic, Department of Surgical Science and Intensive Care, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Milan, Italy.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jan;81(1):120-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.06.037.
Arterial spasm is described as an event occurring after left internal thoracic artery (LITA) harvesting. Many vasodilators have been used to treat or prevent LITA spasm. The aim of this study is to compare the effects between glyceril-trinitrate/verapamil (GV) solution and papaverine to treat LITA spasm and to determine the best delivery method.
One hundred consecutive ischemic patients were randomly assigned to three groups: group GV (n = 34, GV solution), group P (n = 33, papaverine), or group C (n = 33, normal saline). In each patient, pedicled LITA was harvested, thereafter sprayed with the randomized solution, and covered with a sponge. Fifteen minutes after heparin administration, LITA was distally divided; flow per minute was calculated after measuring the free flow for over 15 seconds; this is named "topical free flow." Then, the vasodilator was injected intraluminally and free flow per minute was measured; this is called "intraluminal free flow."
Analysis of variance was applied to detect differences among groups; paired-sample t test was used for LITA topical free flow versus intraluminal free flow within single groups. Mean LITA free flows were as follows: group GV, topical free flow = 38.6 +/- 25.2 mL/min versus intraluminal free flow = 58.8 +/- 29 mL/min (p < 0.0001); group P, topical free flow = 45.4 +/- 38.9 mL/min versus intraluminal free flow mL/min (p < 0.0001); group C, topical free flow = 31.6 +/- 19.9 mL/min versus intraluminal free flow = 34 +/- 19.8 mL/min (p = 0.14). Topical free flow difference among the three groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.1); intraluminal free flow difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Intraluminal free flow in group GV and in group P were higher than intraluminal free flow in group C (p = 0.004 and 0.001, respectively). Intraluminal free flow of group P was higher than that of group GV; this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 1.00).
Glyceril-trinitrate/verapamil solution and papaverine are able to treat the spasm and increase the flow of the LITA, when they are used intraluminally. When used topically, these vasodilator agents do not ensure an optimal free flow.
动脉痉挛被描述为在获取左胸廓内动脉(LITA)后发生的一种情况。许多血管扩张剂已被用于治疗或预防LITA痉挛。本研究的目的是比较硝酸甘油/维拉帕米(GV)溶液和罂粟碱治疗LITA痉挛的效果,并确定最佳给药方法。
连续100例缺血性患者被随机分为三组:GV组(n = 34,GV溶液)、P组(n = 33,罂粟碱)或C组(n = 33,生理盐水)。在每位患者中,获取带蒂LITA,然后喷洒随机分配的溶液,并用海绵覆盖。给予肝素15分钟后,在LITA远端进行分离;测量超过15秒的自由血流后计算每分钟流量;这被称为“局部自由血流”。然后,将血管扩张剂腔内注射,并测量每分钟自由血流;这被称为“腔内自由血流”。
采用方差分析检测组间差异;单组内LITA局部自由血流与腔内自由血流比较采用配对样本t检验。LITA平均自由血流如下:GV组,局部自由血流 = 38.6 ± 25.2 mL/分钟,腔内自由血流 = 58.8 ± 29 mL/分钟(p < 0.0001);P组,局部自由血流 = 45.4 ± 38.9 mL/分钟,腔内自由血流(未给出具体数值)(p < 0.0001);C组,局部自由血流 = 31.6 ± 19.9 mL/分钟,腔内自由血流 = 34 ± 19.8 mL/分钟(p = 0.14)。三组间局部自由血流差异无统计学意义(p = 0.1);腔内自由血流差异有统计学意义(p = 0.001)。GV组和P组的腔内自由血流高于C组(分别为p = 0.004和0.001)。P组的腔内自由血流高于GV组;但该差异未达到统计学意义(p = 1.00)。
硝酸甘油/维拉帕米溶液和罂粟碱在腔内使用时能够治疗痉挛并增加LITA的血流。局部使用时,这些血管扩张剂不能确保最佳的自由血流。