• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨文化边界困境:一种分级风险评估方法。

Cross-cultural boundary dilemmas: a graded-risk assessment approach.

作者信息

Savin Daniel, Martinez Richard

机构信息

University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, CO 80220, USA.

出版信息

Transcult Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;43(2):243-58. doi: 10.1177/1363461506064853.

DOI:10.1177/1363461506064853
PMID:16893874
Abstract

Behavioral health professionals are constantly faced with the dilemma of how to define boundaries in their relationships with clients. When working with groups from diverse cultures, defining boundaries becomes even more complex. This article urges a flexible approach, using the graded-risk model (Martinez, 2000) and a list of cultural factors for clinicians to consider. Possible benefits of reaching out to clients in concrete ways, as well as risks, are emphasized. Clients' notions of appropriate boundaries must be considered in the decision-making process. Case examples from a refugee mental health clinic are used to elucidate a flexible approach to boundary decisions.

摘要

行为健康专业人员一直面临着如何界定与客户关系界限的困境。在与来自不同文化背景的群体合作时,界定界限变得更加复杂。本文倡导一种灵活的方法,运用分级风险模型(马丁内斯,2000年)以及一系列供临床医生考虑的文化因素。文中强调了以具体方式与客户接触可能带来的益处以及风险。在决策过程中必须考虑客户对于适当界限的观念。文中使用了一家难民心理健康诊所的案例来阐明一种灵活的界限决策方法。

相似文献

1
Cross-cultural boundary dilemmas: a graded-risk assessment approach.跨文化边界困境:一种分级风险评估方法。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;43(2):243-58. doi: 10.1177/1363461506064853.
2
A model for boundary dilemmas: ethical decision-making in the patient-professional relationship.边界困境模型:医患关系中的伦理决策
Ethical Hum Sci Serv. 2000 Spring;2(1):43-61.
3
Exploring the edges: boundaries and breaks.探索边缘:边界与断点
Ethics Behav. 1998;8(1):37-48. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0801_3.
4
A practical approach to boundaries in psychotherapy: making decisions, bypassing blunders, and mending fences.心理治疗中界限问题的实用方法:做出决策、避免失误与修复关系。
J Clin Psychol. 2008 May;64(5):638-52. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20477.
5
Differences and similarities in cross-cultural perceptions of boundaries: a comparison of results from two studies.跨文化边界认知的差异与相似性:两项研究结果的比较。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2012 Sep-Dec;35(5-6):398-405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
6
Teetering on the precipice: a commentary on Lazarus's "How certain boundaries and ethics diminish therapeutic effectiveness.徘徊在悬崖边缘:对拉扎勒斯《某些界限和伦理如何降低治疗效果》的评论
Ethics Behav. 1994;4(3):283-6. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0403_14.
7
Discussion of Lazarus's "How certain boundaries and ethics diminish therapeutic effectiveness.关于拉扎勒斯的《某些界限和伦理如何降低治疗效果》的讨论
Ethics Behav. 1994;4(3):295-8. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0403_16.
8
Response to Lazarus's "How certain boundaries and ethics diminish therapeutic effectiveness.对拉扎勒斯《某些界限和伦理如何降低治疗效果》的回应
Ethics Behav. 1994;4(3):263-6. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0403_11.
9
Maintaining therapeutic boundaries: the motive is therapeutic effectiveness, not defensive practice.维持治疗界限:动机在于治疗效果,而非防御性做法。
Ethics Behav. 1994;4(3):267-73. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0403_12.
10
A continuing medical education approach to improve sexual boundaries of physicians.一种通过继续医学教育来改善医生性界限的方法。
Bull Menninger Clin. 2008 Winter;72(1):38-53. doi: 10.1521/bumc.2008.72.1.38.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines for Training in Cultural Psychiatry.文化精神病学培训指南。
Can J Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;66(2):195-246. doi: 10.1177/0706743720907505. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
2
Ethics and Medical Practice: Why Psychiatry is Unique.伦理与医疗实践:为何精神病学独具特色
Indian J Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;58(Suppl 2):S199-S202. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.196838.
3
Connecting Cultures: A training model promoting evidence-based psychological services for refugees.连接文化:一种促进为难民提供循证心理服务的培训模式。
Train Educ Prof Psychol. 2014 Nov;8(4):320-327. doi: 10.1037/tep0000071.