Suratt Paul M, Peruggia Mario, D'Andrea Lynn, Diamond Robert, Barth Jeffrey T, Nikova Margarita, Perriello Vito A, Johnson Michael L
Department of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Critical Care Division, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA.
Pediatrics. 2006 Sep;118(3):e771-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0173. Epub 2006 Aug 7.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether risks of impaired cognitive function could be predicted for children or groups of children with adenotonsillar hypertrophy who were suspected of having obstructive sleep-disordered breathing, from historical and polysomnographic variables used separately or in combination.
We studied 114 consecutive 6- to 12-year-old children with adenotonsillar hypertrophy, who were referred because of suspected obstructive sleep-disordered breathing, with questionnaires, assessment of tonsil size, general and memory cognitive tests, and attended polysomnography with the use of nasal pressure recording to detect flow.
There were important significant relationships between snore group (snored every night versus less often), sleep efficiency, and race and 2 of 3 general cognitive tests (vocabulary and similarities). Significant but weaker relationships were observed between sleep latency and 2 memory indices (verbal memory and general memory) and between sleep efficiency and 2 behavior indices (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder summary and hyperactive-impulsive summary). The number of episodes of apnea and hypopnea per 1 hour of sleep predicted the vocabulary score as well as did the snore group, but it did not predict other tests as well as other variables. Tonsil size did not predict any cognitive or behavior score. Confidence intervals for group means were small, whereas prediction intervals for individual children were large.
Risk of impaired cognitive function and behavior can be predicted from snoring history, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, and race but not tonsil size. The combination of snoring history and polysomnographic variables predicted impaired cognitive scores better than did either alone. The snoring history predicted more test scores than the number of episodes of apnea and hypopnea per 1 hour of sleep.
本研究旨在确定对于疑似患有阻塞性睡眠呼吸障碍的腺样体扁桃体肥大儿童或儿童群体,能否根据单独或联合使用的病史和多导睡眠图变量来预测认知功能受损的风险。
我们研究了114名连续的6至12岁腺样体扁桃体肥大儿童,这些儿童因疑似阻塞性睡眠呼吸障碍而被转诊,采用问卷调查、扁桃体大小评估、一般认知和记忆测试,并使用鼻压力记录进行多导睡眠监测以检测气流。
打鼾组(每晚打鼾与较少打鼾)、睡眠效率、种族与三项一般认知测试中的两项(词汇和相似性)之间存在重要的显著关系。在睡眠潜伏期与两项记忆指标(言语记忆和一般记忆)之间以及睡眠效率与两项行为指标(注意力缺陷/多动障碍总结和多动冲动总结)之间观察到显著但较弱的关系。每小时睡眠中的呼吸暂停和低通气发作次数与打鼾组一样能预测词汇得分,但在预测其他测试和其他变量方面不如其他变量。扁桃体大小不能预测任何认知或行为得分。组均值的置信区间较小,而个体儿童的预测区间较大。
认知功能和行为受损的风险可以通过打鼾史、睡眠效率、睡眠潜伏期和种族来预测,但不能通过扁桃体大小来预测。打鼾史和多导睡眠图变量的组合比单独使用任何一个都能更好地预测认知功能受损得分。打鼾史比每小时睡眠中的呼吸暂停和低通气发作次数能预测更多的测试得分。