• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教学方法研究。

Research on teaching methods.

作者信息

Oermann M H

出版信息

NLN Publ. 1990 Jan(15-2339):1-31.

PMID:1689480
Abstract

Research on teaching methods in nursing education was categorized into studies on media, CAI, and other nontraditional instructional strategies. While the research differed, some generalizations may be made from the findings. Multimedia, whether it is used for individual or group instruction, is at least as effective as traditional instruction (lecture and lecture-discussion) in promoting cognitive learning, retention of knowledge, and performance. Further study is needed to identify variables that may influence learning and retention. While learner attitudes toward mediated instruction tended to be positive, investigators failed to control for the effect of novelty. Control over intervening variables was lacking in the majority of studies as well. Research indicated that CAI is as effective as other teaching methods in terms of knowledge gain and retention. Attitudes toward CAI tended to be favorable, with similar problems in measurement as those evidenced in studies of media. Chang (1986) also recommends that future research examine the impact of computer-video interactive instruction on students, faculty, and settings. Research is needed on experimental teaching methods, strategies for teaching problem solving and clinical judgment, and ways of improving the traditional lecture and discussion. Limited research in these areas makes generalizations impossible. There is a particular need for research on how to teach students the diagnostic reasoning process and encourage critical thinking, both in terms of appropriate teaching methods and the way in which those strategies should be used. It is interesting that few researchers studied lecture and lecture-discussion except as comparable teaching methods for research on other strategies. Additional research questions may be generated on lecture and discussion in relation to promoting concept learning, an understanding of nursing and other theories, transfer of knowledge, and development of cognitive skills. Few studies attempted to identify variables that may influence learning, particularly characteristics of the learner. Only six investigators addressed learning styles and their interactions with the teaching method and outcomes (Gillies, 1984; Goldsmith, 1984; Kirchhoff & Holzemer, 1979; Kissinger & Munjas, 1981; Norris, 1986; Stein et al., 1972). Research in the future needs to focus on the relationship of different learner characteristics, attributes of the teaching method, and learning outcomes. In addition, initial learning, retention, transfer to practice, and instructional time should be studied. Characteristics of the teacher and setting and relationship to the methodologies used and outcomes of instruction need investigation. Research should attempt to identify optimal conditions for learning and ways in which methods should be used for particular students, subject matter, and points in the nursing curriculum...

摘要

护理教育教学方法的研究分为对媒体、计算机辅助教学(CAI)以及其他非传统教学策略的研究。尽管研究各有不同,但仍可从研究结果中得出一些一般性结论。多媒体,无论用于个别教学还是小组教学,在促进认知学习、知识保留和表现方面至少与传统教学(讲座和讲座讨论)同样有效。需要进一步研究以确定可能影响学习和知识保留的变量。虽然学习者对媒介教学的态度往往是积极的,但研究人员未能控制新奇性的影响。大多数研究也缺乏对干预变量的控制。研究表明,就知识获取和保留而言,计算机辅助教学与其他教学方法同样有效。对计算机辅助教学的态度往往是积极的,在测量方面存在与媒介研究中类似的问题。张(1986)还建议未来的研究考察计算机视频互动教学对学生、教师和教学环境的影响。需要对实验教学方法、解决问题和临床判断的教学策略以及改进传统讲座和讨论的方法进行研究。这些领域的研究有限,无法得出一般性结论。尤其需要研究如何教授学生诊断推理过程并鼓励批判性思维,包括合适的教学方法以及这些策略的使用方式。有趣的是,除了作为研究其他策略的可比教学方法外,很少有研究人员研究讲座和讲座讨论。关于讲座和讨论在促进概念学习、对护理及其他理论的理解、知识迁移和认知技能发展方面可能会产生更多研究问题。很少有研究试图确定可能影响学习的变量,特别是学习者的特征。只有六位研究人员探讨了学习风格及其与教学方法和结果的相互作用(吉利斯,1984;戈德史密斯,1984;基尔希霍夫和霍尔泽默,1979;基辛格和蒙贾斯,1981;诺里斯,1986;斯坦等人,1972)。未来的研究需要关注不同学习者特征、教学方法的属性和学习结果之间的关系。此外,还应研究初始学习、知识保留、向实践的迁移以及教学时间。教师和教学环境的特征以及它们与所使用的方法和教学结果的关系需要进行调查。研究应试图确定学习的最佳条件以及针对特定学生、主题和护理课程中的要点应如何使用教学方法……

相似文献

1
Research on teaching methods.教学方法研究。
NLN Publ. 1990 Jan(15-2339):1-31.
2
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
3
Knowledge, retention, and attitude effects of computer-assisted instruction.计算机辅助教学的知识、记忆及态度影响
J Nurs Educ. 1988 Jan;27(1):30-4. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19880101-08.
4
Computer-aided vs. tutor-delivered teaching of exposure therapy for phobia/panic: randomized controlled trial with pre-registration nursing students.计算机辅助与教师指导的针对恐惧症/恐慌症的暴露疗法教学:对预注册护理专业学生的随机对照试验
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Mar;44(3):397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.02.009. Epub 2006 Apr 24.
5
Computer-managed instruction: an alternative teaching strategy.计算机管理教学:一种替代教学策略。
J Nurs Educ. 1987 Jan;26(1):30-6. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19870101-08.
6
Application of teaching and learning principles to computer-aided instruction.教学原则在计算机辅助教学中的应用。
MD Comput. 1989 Sep-Oct;6(5):267-73.
7
Comparison of Internet versus lecture instructional methods for teaching nursing research.互联网教学法与讲座教学法在护理研究教学中的比较。
J Prof Nurs. 2000 May-Jun;16(3):132-9. doi: 10.1053/PN.2000.5919.
8
Computer assisted instruction: learning, attitude, and modes of instruction.计算机辅助教学:学习、态度与教学模式。
Comput Nurs. 1994 May-Jun;12(3):164-70.
9
Learner-control vs. program-control instructional multimedia: a comparison of two interactions when teaching principles of orthodontic appliances.学习者控制与程序控制的教学多媒体:正畸矫治器原理教学中两种交互方式的比较
Eur J Dent Educ. 2005 Nov;9(4):157-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2005.00385.x.
10
Interactive instruction in otolaryngology resident education.耳鼻咽喉科住院医师教育中的互动式教学
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2007 Dec;40(6):1203-14, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2007.07.002.