Jütte Robert
Institut für Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung Straussweg 17, 70184 Stuttgart, Germany.
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2005;27(1):71-9.
Medical history has so far paid hardly any attention to the longue durée, a history in which, according to Braudel, 'all change is slow'. It is therefore one of the challenges of the emerging field of the social history of medicine to work audaciously across time as well as across space. An interesting subject, for example, is the history of contraception. Throughout history, there has been almost nothing people have worried about more than having sex without fear of consequence. At first sight, the story of contraception seems to be one of progress, from the Ancient Egyptian crocodile-dung pessary to the modern-day condom and contraceptive pill. A closer look, however, shows a pattern of remarkable continuities in the reproductive behaviour of men and women over the last two thousand years. In this paper, I shall attempt to show why traditional male-dominated contraceptive methods still linger on despite the sexual revolution brought about by the invention of the 'pill' in the late 1950s.
迄今为止,医学史几乎没有关注到长时段,在布罗代尔看来,这种历史中“一切变化都是缓慢的”。因此,新兴的医学社会史领域面临的挑战之一,就是要大胆地跨越时间和空间进行研究。例如,避孕史就是一个有趣的课题。纵观历史,几乎没有什么比性行为而不担心后果更让人们担忧的了。乍一看,避孕的故事似乎是一个进步的故事,从古埃及的鳄鱼粪阴道栓剂到现代的避孕套和避孕药。然而,仔细观察会发现,在过去两千年里,男性和女性的生殖行为存在着显著的连续性模式。在本文中,我将试图说明为什么尽管20世纪50年代末避孕药的发明带来了性革命,但传统的男性主导的避孕方法仍然存在。