Lindeberg Sara I, Ostergren Per-Olof, Lindbladh Eva
Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Division of Social Medicine and Global Health, Department of Health Sciences, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Stress. 2006 Jun;9(2):117-23. doi: 10.1080/10253890600823485.
Stress-related exhaustion is an increasingly focused phenomenon, although scientifically not yet fully conceptualised. This is perhaps partly due to the fact that the distinction between exhaustion and other already established concepts, such as depression, is not clear. This study explores whether exhaustion can be differentiated from depression and anxiety, by means of introducing the SF-36 vitality scale as a strategy for the measurement of exhaustion. The Malmö Shoulder and Neck Study cohort, in this study including 12,607 middle-aged men and women, was utilized. Depression and anxiety were assessed by the general health questionnaire (GHQ). Factor analysis was performed in order to potentially discriminate between the included measures. Factor analysis showed that all four exhaustion items of the (inverted) SF-36 vitality scale loaded on a single factor, separate from the GHQ depression and anxiety factors. These results support the notion that exhaustion can be distinguished from depression and anxiety, providing an empirical foundation for defining exhaustion as a unique concept. Furthermore, since SF-36 has been widely used in clinical and epidemiological studies, the benefits of using the SF-36 vitality scale in the assessment of exhaustion could be substantial.
与压力相关的疲惫是一个日益受到关注的现象,尽管在科学上尚未完全概念化。这可能部分是由于疲惫与其他已确立的概念(如抑郁)之间的区别并不明确。本研究通过引入SF-36活力量表作为测量疲惫的一种策略,探讨疲惫是否可以与抑郁和焦虑区分开来。本研究使用了马尔默肩颈研究队列,其中包括12607名中年男性和女性。通过一般健康问卷(GHQ)评估抑郁和焦虑。进行因子分析以潜在地区分所纳入的测量指标。因子分析表明,(反向的)SF-36活力量表的所有四个疲惫项目都加载在一个单一因子上,与GHQ抑郁和焦虑因子分开。这些结果支持了疲惫可以与抑郁和焦虑区分开来的观点,为将疲惫定义为一个独特概念提供了实证基础。此外,由于SF-36已在临床和流行病学研究中广泛使用,在疲惫评估中使用SF-36活力量表的益处可能很大。