Lee Sang Kun, Lee Seo-Young, Yun Chang-Ho, Lee Ho-Young, Lee Jae-Sung, Lee Dong-Soo
Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, 28, Yongon-Dong, Jongno-Gu, 100-744, Seoul, South Korea.
Neuroradiology. 2006 Sep;48(9):678-84. doi: 10.1007/s00234-006-0106-z. Epub 2006 Aug 5.
The aims of this analysis were to: (1) determine the value of ictal SPECT in the localization of neocortical epileptogenic foci, (2) evaluate the relationships between the results of ictal SPECT and other potential affecting factors, and (3) compare traditional visual analysis and the subtraction method.
We retrospectively analyzed 81 consecutive patients with neocortical epilepsy who underwent epilepsy surgery and achieved a favourable surgical outcome, including 36 patients with normal MRI. Side-by-side visual analysis and subtraction images were classified as correctly localizing,correctly lateralizing, or non-localizing/non-lateralizing images according to the resected lobe.
Side-by-side visual analysis and subtraction SPECT correctly localized the epileptogenic lobe in 58.9% and 63.0% of patients, respectively. The two methods were complementary and the diagnostic sensitivity of ictal SPECT using the two methods was 79.0%. Ictal SPECT using the visual method correctly localized the epileptogenic lobe more frequently in patients with a localizing pattern of ictal scalp EEG at the time of radioligand injection. When using subtraction images, an injection delay of less than 20 s after seizure onset was significantly correlated with correct localization. The subtraction method was superior to the visual method for localizing frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) and parietal lobe epilepsy (PLE), and in patients with non-localizing/non-lateralizing EEG at onset.
Ictal SPECT analyses using visual and subtraction methods are useful and complementary for the localization of the epileptogenic foci of neocortical epilepsy. Early radioligand injection and ictal EEG patterns are related to ictal SPECT localization. The subtraction method may be more useful in some epileptic syndromes.
本分析的目的是:(1)确定发作期单光子发射计算机断层扫描(ictal SPECT)在新皮质癫痫病灶定位中的价值;(2)评估发作期SPECT结果与其他潜在影响因素之间的关系;(3)比较传统视觉分析和减影法。
我们回顾性分析了81例连续接受癫痫手术且手术效果良好的新皮质癫痫患者,其中36例患者MRI正常。根据切除的脑叶,将并排视觉分析图像和减影图像分类为正确定位、正确定侧或非定位/非定侧图像。
并排视觉分析和减影SPECT分别在58.9%和63.0%的患者中正确定位了癫痫发作脑叶。两种方法具有互补性,使用这两种方法的发作期SPECT诊断敏感性为79.0%。在放射性配体注射时发作期头皮脑电图有定位模式的患者中,使用视觉方法的发作期SPECT更频繁地正确定位癫痫发作脑叶。使用减影图像时,发作开始后注射延迟小于20秒与正确定位显著相关。减影法在额叶癫痫(FLE)和顶叶癫痫(PLE)的定位以及发作时脑电图非定位/非定侧的患者中优于视觉方法。
使用视觉和减影方法的发作期SPECT分析对于新皮质癫痫致痫灶的定位是有用且互补的。早期放射性配体注射和发作期脑电图模式与发作期SPECT定位有关。减影法在某些癫痫综合征中可能更有用。