Horenstein M S, Idriss S F, Hamilton R M, Kanter R J, Webster P A, Karpawich P P
Duke University Medical Center, Pediatric Cardiology Division, Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2006 Sep-Oct;27(5):589-93. doi: 10.1007/s00246-005-1155-5.
Endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard survey for cardiac graft rejection. Signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) identifies slowly conducting, diseased myocardium. We sought to determine whether SAECG is a sensitive, noninvasive transplant surveillance method in the young.Ninety-four SAECGs recorded prior to biopsy in 20 young transplant (OHT) patients and those from 15 healthy age-matched controls (CTL) were analyzed. In the OHT group, 56 no-rejection (NOREJ) (ISHLT grades 0 or 1 A) and 37 acute rejection (REJ) (ISHLT grades IB, 2, and 3A) SAECGs were compared, SAECGs were filtered at 40-255 Hz. Total QRS duration (QRSd), duration of terminal low amplitude of QRS under 40 microV (LAS), and root mean square amplitude of terminal 40 msec of QRS (RMS40) were compared.SAECGs were significantly different in CTL vs NOREJ but not in NOREJ vs REJ: QRSd, 81.7 +/- 8, 107.2 +/- 18.4, and 112.3 +/- 21.6 msec, respectively; LAS, (18 +/- 5.8, 23.6 +/- 10.7, and 27 +/- 14.8 msec, respectively; and RMS40, (169.3 +/- 100.4, 68 +/- 48.8, and 57.5 +/- 45.6 microV, respectively. Children following OHT exhibited significant differences in the SAECG compared to controls. Differences between the NOREJ and REJ groups were negligible. Therefore, SAECG may not be effective in detecting OHT rejection in the young.
心内膜心肌活检是心脏移植排斥反应的金标准检查方法。信号平均心电图(SAECG)可识别传导缓慢的病变心肌。我们试图确定SAECG在年轻人中是否是一种敏感的无创移植监测方法。分析了20例年轻心脏移植(OHT)患者活检前记录的94份SAECG以及15例年龄匹配的健康对照者(CTL)的SAECG。在OHT组中,比较了56份无排斥反应(NOREJ)(国际心脏和肺移植学会(ISHLT)0级或1A级)和37份急性排斥反应(REJ)(ISHLT 1B级、2级和3A级)的SAECG,SAECG在40 - 255Hz进行滤波。比较了总QRS时限(QRSd)、40微伏以下QRS终末低振幅时限(LAS)和QRS终末40毫秒的均方根振幅(RMS40)。CTL组与NOREJ组的SAECG有显著差异,但NOREJ组与REJ组无显著差异:QRSd分别为81.7±8、107.2±18.4和112.3±21.6毫秒;LAS分别为(18±5.8、23.6±10.7和27±14.8毫秒;RMS40分别为(169.3±100.4、68±48.8和57.5±45.6微伏。OHT术后儿童的SAECG与对照组相比有显著差异。NOREJ组和REJ组之间的差异可忽略不计。因此,SAECG可能无法有效检测年轻人的OHT排斥反应。