Oosterhof Jan, De Boo Theo M, Oostendorp Rob A B, Wilder-Smith Oliver H G, Crul Ben J P
Research Centre for Allied Health Care, 645 Department of Physiotherapy CSS, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Headache Pain. 2006 Sep;7(4):196-205. doi: 10.1007/s10194-006-0309-z. Epub 2006 Aug 11.
The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of shortterm transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) treatment in chronic pain with respect to pain intensity and patients' satisfaction with treatment results. We therefore performed a randomised controlled trial comparing TENS and sham TENS. Patients, researchers and therapists were blinded for treatment allocation. One hundred and sixty-three patients with chronic pain referred to the Pain Centre entered the study. Conventional TENS and sham TENS were applied in the segments of pain, for a period of ten days. Outcome measures were pain intensity (visual analogue scale) and patients' satisfaction with treatment result (yes or no). The proportions of patients satisfied with treatment result differed significantly for TENS compared to sham TENS (58 and 42.7% respectively, chi(2)=3.8, p=0.05). However, no differences in pain intensity were found for patients treated with TENS or sham TENS. Only for patients satisfied with treatment results pain intensity gradually decrease equally both for TENS and sham TENS with repeated treatment application.
本研究的目的是就疼痛强度和患者对治疗结果的满意度,测试短期经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)治疗慢性疼痛的疗效。因此,我们进行了一项随机对照试验,比较TENS和假TENS。患者、研究人员和治疗师对治疗分配均不知情。163名转诊至疼痛中心的慢性疼痛患者进入了该研究。在疼痛部位应用传统TENS和假TENS,为期十天。结果指标为疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表)和患者对治疗结果的满意度(是或否)。与假TENS相比,TENS治疗后对治疗结果满意的患者比例有显著差异(分别为58%和42.7%,χ²=3.8,p=0.05)。然而,接受TENS或假TENS治疗的患者在疼痛强度上没有差异。仅对于对治疗结果满意的患者,随着重复治疗应用,TENS和假TENS的疼痛强度均逐渐同等程度降低。