Ryan Joseph J, Tree Heather A, Morris Jeri, Gontkovsky Samuel T
Department of Psychology, Central Missouri State University, Warrensburg 64093, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 2006 Oct;62(10):1319-26. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20307.
This study assessed the validity of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III) inter-subtest scatter (as measured by the scaled score range) as an indication of cognitive impairment due to brain dysfunction. Participants were 174 individuals with documented brain damage. Means for age, education, and WAIS-III full-scale IQ were 49.19 years (SD = 15.33), 12.57 years, (SD = 2.78), and 88.45 (SD = 17.78). The scatter ranges for brain-damaged participants were compared with those of the WAIS-III standardization sample. Results indicated that the full-scale IQ is significantly correlated with amount of scatter, r(172) = .42, p < .0001, so that a definitive answer to the question requires control of full-scale IQ. In the present analyses, inter-subtest scatter among the individuals for the sample as a whole was no greater than that for persons in the standardization sample, but subtest scatter was significantly greater for participants with IQs > or = 90. This finding suggests that there may be small differences in scatter between brain-damaged persons and normal controls, but that scatter is relatively insensitive to the presence of brain damage or dysfunction. Therefore, interpretation of marked inter-subtest variability as a sign of brain damage appears unwarranted.
本研究评估了韦氏成人智力量表第三版(WAIS - III)各分测验间离散程度(以量表分数范围衡量)作为脑功能障碍所致认知损害指标的有效性。研究对象为174名有脑损伤记录的个体。年龄、受教育年限和WAIS - III全量表智商的均值分别为49.19岁(标准差 = 15.33)、12.57年(标准差 = 2.78)和88.45(标准差 = 17.78)。将脑损伤参与者的离散程度范围与WAIS - III标准化样本的进行比较。结果表明,全量表智商与离散程度显著相关,r(172) = .42,p < .0001,因此要回答这个问题需要控制全量表智商。在本分析中,整个样本个体间的分测验间离散程度并不比标准化样本中的个体大,但智商≥90的参与者的分测验离散程度显著更大。这一发现表明,脑损伤者与正常对照组在离散程度上可能存在细微差异,但离散程度对脑损伤或功能障碍的存在相对不敏感。因此,将显著的分测验间变异性解释为脑损伤的迹象似乎没有依据。