Ryan Joseph J, Morris Jeri, Brown Kristina I, Glass Laura A
Central Missouri State University, Warrensburg, MO 64093, USA.
Assessment. 2006 Dec;13(4):391-5. doi: 10.1177/1073191106289889.
According to the WAIS-III Administration and Scoring Manual, Object Assembly (OA) may be substituted for any spoiled Performance subtest. This assertion has not been evaluated in a clinical sample. The present investigation reports differences that resulted in Performance IQ (PIQ) and Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) when OA replaced each of the Performance subtests. Participants were 47 referrals for neuropsychological assessment (age M = 45.98 years, SD = 9.82; education M = 13.82 years, SD = 2.78). Results indicated that OA may replace any Performance subtest without seriously altering the summary scores. Differences between the standard IQs and OA-based composites were < 2 points for PIQ and < 1 point for FSIQ. More than 90% of the OA-based composites fell within the 90% confidence limits of the corresponding IQ.
根据《韦氏成人智力量表第三版施测与计分手册》,图形拼凑(OA)可替代任何一项被破坏的操作分测验。这一论断尚未在临床样本中得到评估。本研究报告了用OA替代每项操作分测验时,对操作智商(PIQ)和全量表智商(FSIQ)所产生的差异。研究参与者为47名转介进行神经心理学评估的患者(年龄M = 45.98岁,标准差 = 9.82;受教育年限M = 13.82年,标准差 = 2.78)。结果表明,OA可替代任何一项操作分测验,而不会严重改变总分。标准智商与基于OA的合成分数之间的差异,PIQ小于2分,FSIQ小于1分。超过90%的基于OA的合成分数落在相应智商的90%置信区间内。