• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在医疗环境中努力创建高可靠性组织:来自该领域的见解。

Struggling to invent high-reliability organizations in health care settings: Insights from the field.

作者信息

Dixon Nancy M, Shofer Marjorie

机构信息

Common Knowledge Associates, 2857 Selma Lane, Dallas, TX 75234, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 2):1618-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00568.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00568.x
PMID:16898982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1955344/
Abstract

The Mission of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has been to support and conduct health services research and to disseminate those research findings. Recently the Agency has changed its mission to: "Improving the quality, safety, efficiency and effectiveness of health care for all Americans." For agency personnel working with the topic of patient safety, that change has created a need to develop greater awareness of the current patient safety initiatives underway at leading health care systems in order to determine where AHRQ might best play a role in helping these systems more rapidly adopt new practices to improve patient safety. In order to make that determination, AHRQ conducted a customer needs assessment of leaders in selected health care systems, asking them questions about their current implementation initiatives and their perceived needs for continued implementation of patient safety initiatives. Although not designed or conducted as a research study, the hour-long interviews produced rich insights into the implementation efforts of patient safety initiatives. The senior leaders interviewed in each of the health care systems, described implementing patient safety initiatives on multiple fronts-in some systems as many as 15 initiatives were underway. As the number of initiatives attests, there was no lack of knowledge about what patient safety practices should be implemented (CPOE, rapid response teams, reduction in surgical site infections) rather the major struggle these health care systems faced was the "how to" of implementation. Most initiatives were only newly begun, so these leaders were not yet confident about what they had learned from these efforts or whether they could be sustained over time. These health care systems drew many of the ideas for initiatives from outside of health care, for example, the nuclear power industry or aviation. The executives expressed concern about a number of issues including: how patient safety initiatives should be sequenced, the lack of benchmarking data to measure their systems against and the pressing need for IT standardization. The insights from this customer needs assessment revealed a wealth of implementation knowledge in the field and has led AHRQ to create an opportunity for leading edge health care systems to learn from each other via learning networks.

摘要

医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)的使命一直是支持并开展卫生服务研究,以及传播这些研究成果。最近,该机构将其使命改为:“提高所有美国人医疗保健的质量、安全性、效率和有效性。”对于从事患者安全主题工作的机构人员而言,这一变化使得他们有必要更深入地了解领先医疗保健系统当前正在开展的患者安全举措,以便确定AHRQ在帮助这些系统更快地采用新做法以改善患者安全方面能够发挥最佳作用的领域。为了做出这一决定,AHRQ对选定医疗保健系统的领导者进行了客户需求评估,询问他们有关当前实施举措以及他们对持续实施患者安全举措的感知需求的问题。尽管此次访谈并非作为一项研究进行设计或实施,但为时一小时的访谈为患者安全举措的实施努力提供了丰富的见解。在每个医疗保健系统中接受访谈的高级领导者描述了在多个方面实施患者安全举措的情况——在一些系统中,多达15项举措正在进行。正如举措的数量所证明的那样,对于应该实施哪些患者安全做法(电子病历医嘱录入系统、快速反应团队、减少手术部位感染)并不缺乏了解,相反,这些医疗保健系统面临的主要难题是实施的“方法”。大多数举措才刚刚开始,因此这些领导者对从这些努力中学到的东西以及这些举措能否长期持续下去尚无信心。这些医疗保健系统的许多举措创意都来自医疗保健领域之外,例如核电行业或航空业。高管们对一系列问题表示担忧,包括:患者安全举措应如何排序、缺乏用于与自身系统进行对比的基准数据,以及对信息技术标准化的迫切需求。此次客户需求评估的见解揭示了该领域丰富的实施知识,并促使AHRQ为前沿医疗保健系统创造了一个通过学习网络相互学习的机会。

相似文献

1
Struggling to invent high-reliability organizations in health care settings: Insights from the field.在医疗环境中努力创建高可靠性组织:来自该领域的见解。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 2):1618-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00568.x.
2
AHRQ issues critical analysis of patient safety practices.美国医疗保健研究与质量局发布了对患者安全实践的批判性分析。
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 2001 Aug;13(8):8-12, 1.
3
Implementing a national strategy for patient safety: lessons from the National Health Service in England.实施国家患者安全战略:来自英国国民医疗服务体系的经验教训。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Apr;14(2):135-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011882.
4
Current pulse: can a production system reduce medical errors in health care?当前脉冲:生产系统能否减少医疗保健中的医疗差错?
Qual Manag Health Care. 2007 Jul-Sep;16(3):226-38. doi: 10.1097/01.QMH.0000281059.30355.76.
5
Hospitalists as emerging leaders in patient safety: lessons learned and future directions.医院医师作为患者安全领域的新兴领导者:经验教训和未来方向。
J Patient Saf. 2009 Mar;5(1):3-8. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e31819751f2.
6
Status of quality initiatives, Part II.质量改进措施的现状,第二部分。
Mich Health Hosp. 2001 May-Jun;37(3):20-2.
7
Analysis of clinical incidents: a window on the system not a search for root causes.临床事件分析:洞察系统的窗口而非探寻根本原因
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Aug;13(4):242-3. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.4.242.
8
Improving safety for children with cardiac disease.提高患有心脏病儿童的安全性。
Cardiol Young. 2007 Sep;17 Suppl 2:127-32. doi: 10.1017/S1047951107001230.
9
Databases for outcomes research: what has 10 years of experience taught us?结果研究数据库:十年经验给了我们什么启示?
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 Aug-Sep;10(5):445-55. doi: 10.1002/pds.597.
10
The role for leaders of health care organizations in patient safety.医疗保健组织领导者在患者安全方面的作用。
Am J Med Qual. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):311-8. doi: 10.1177/1062860607304743.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing HRO Principles under Stress: A Hospital's Journey toward High Reliability.在压力下践行高可靠性组织原则:一家医院迈向高可靠性的历程。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2025 May 22;10(3):e816. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000816. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
2
Encouraging openness in health care: Policy and practice implications of a mixed-methods study in the English National Health Service.鼓励医疗保健领域的开放:一项在英国国民保健制度中进行的混合方法研究的政策和实践意义。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2023 Jan;28(1):14-24. doi: 10.1177/13558196221109053. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
3
Nonoperating room anaesthesia: safety, monitoring, cognitive aids and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.非手术室麻醉:安全、监测、认知辅助和严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Aug;33(4):554-560. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000895.
4
Assessment of High Reliability Organizations Model in Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran.伊朗德黑兰法拉比眼科医院高可靠性组织模型评估
Iran J Public Health. 2018 Jan;47(1):77-85.
5
High-reliability health care: getting there from here.高可靠性医疗保健:从这里到那里。
Milbank Q. 2013 Sep;91(3):459-90. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12023.
6
Medication incident reporting in residential aged care facilities: limitations and risks to residents' safety.养老机构药物事件报告:对居民安全的限制和风险。
BMC Geriatr. 2012 Nov 2;12:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-67.
7
Web-based hazard and near-miss reporting as part of a patient safety curriculum.基于网络的危害和险兆事件报告作为患者安全课程的一部分。
J Nurs Educ. 2009 Dec;48(12):669-77. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20091113-03.

本文引用的文献

1
A multihospital safety improvement effort and the dissemination of new knowledge.一项多医院安全改进工作及新知识的传播。
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Mar;29(3):124-33. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(03)29015-8.