Schlecht U, Malavé A, Gronewold T M A, Tewes M, Löhndorf M
Center of Advanced European Studies and Research (caesar), Ludwig-Erhard-Allee 2, 53173 Bonn, Germany.
Biosens Bioelectron. 2007 Apr 15;22(9-10):2337-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.06.034. Epub 2006 Aug 9.
Two different impedance-sensor geometries have been compared for the detection of Rev peptides with a molecular weight of 2.4 kDa. Planar, two-dimensional interdigitated capacitor (IDC) sensors with electrode separations of 1.1 microm as well as three-dimensional nanogap-sensors with an electrode separation of 75 nm have been used. Both sensors have been operated at a fixed frequency of 980 MHz. We discuss the specific interaction of the Rev peptide to an immobilized RNA anti-Rev aptamer (9.2 kDa) for peptide concentrations in the range of 100 nM-2 microM. For the IDC sensor, only peptide concentrations above 500 nM gave detectable signals. For the nanogap sensor, the binding process was clearly visible for all concentrations applied. The higher sensitivity of the nanogap compared to the IDC is ascribed to the improved surface-to-volume ratio.
为检测分子量为2.4 kDa的Rev肽,对两种不同的阻抗传感器几何结构进行了比较。使用了电极间距为1.1微米的平面二维叉指电容器(IDC)传感器以及电极间距为75纳米的三维纳米间隙传感器。两种传感器均在980 MHz的固定频率下运行。我们讨论了Rev肽与固定化的抗Rev RNA适配体(9.2 kDa)在100 nM至2 microM范围内的肽浓度下的特异性相互作用。对于IDC传感器,只有高于500 nM的肽浓度才能给出可检测信号。对于纳米间隙传感器,在所施加的所有浓度下,结合过程都清晰可见。纳米间隙传感器相较于IDC传感器具有更高的灵敏度,这归因于其改善的表面体积比。