Weber J M, Sircar S, Fleurent J, Hamel M
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
J Gen Virol. 1990 Mar;71 ( Pt 3):585-91. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-71-3-585.
We have isolated drug-resistant variants from adenovirus-transformed rat cells that had concomitantly lost their transformed phenotype. Our aim was to determine the reason for reversion, to attempt retransformation with 5-azacytidine (5-AzaC) and to study the mechanism of retransformation. Of the three cell lines studied, one (G4F) had lost the integrated E1a genes, whereas the other two (G2a and G5) failed to synthesize E1a RNA or proteins. Incubation of these cell lines with 3 microM-5-AzaC for 2 days, followed by passaging in the absence of drug, gave rise to transformed foci in all of the cell lines. The efficiency of transformation was typical of each cell line. Surprisingly, retransformation was not accompanied by the reappearance of detectable levels of E1a gene activity in the G2aAza and G5Aza cell lines. In search of a mechanistic explanation for the loss of gene activity in the revertants and its reappearance in the retransformants, we examined the state of methylation of the E1a gene region in these cells. Neither the E1a promoter nor its upstream region was methylated in the revertants or the 5-AzaC retransformants. These results suggest that E1a transcription was suppressed by mechanisms other than DNA methylation and that 5-AzaC could retransform these cells without lifting the E1a-suppressed state.
我们从腺病毒转化的大鼠细胞中分离出了耐药变体,这些细胞同时失去了它们的转化表型。我们的目的是确定回复突变的原因,尝试用5-氮杂胞苷(5-AzaC)进行再转化,并研究再转化的机制。在所研究的三个细胞系中,一个(G4F)丢失了整合的E1a基因,而另外两个(G2a和G5)未能合成E1a RNA或蛋白质。将这些细胞系与3 microM - 5-AzaC孵育2天,然后在无药物的情况下传代,所有细胞系中都产生了转化灶。转化效率是每个细胞系的典型特征。令人惊讶的是,在G2aAza和G5Aza细胞系中,再转化并未伴随着可检测水平的E1a基因活性的重新出现。为了寻找回复突变体中基因活性丧失及其在再转化体中重新出现的机制解释,我们检查了这些细胞中E1a基因区域的甲基化状态。在回复突变体或5-AzaC再转化体中,E1a启动子及其上游区域均未甲基化。这些结果表明,E1a转录受到DNA甲基化以外的机制抑制,并且5-AzaC可以在不解除E1a抑制状态的情况下使这些细胞再转化。