• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从夏沃案中汲取的法律与政策教训:我们选择自己所需医疗护理的权利是否真的面临严重风险?

Legal and policy lessons from the Schiavo case: is our right to choose the medical care we want seriously at risk?

作者信息

Lazzarini Zita, Arons Stephen, Wisniewski Alice

机构信息

Division of Medical Humanities, Health Law and Ethics, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, 263 Farmington Avenue, MC 6325, Farmington, CT 06030-6325, USA.

出版信息

Palliat Support Care. 2006 Jun;4(2):145-53. doi: 10.1017/s1478951506060202.

DOI:10.1017/s1478951506060202
PMID:16903585
Abstract

The article explores the individual patient's right to refuse, withdraw, or insist on medical treatment where there is conflict over these issues involving health care personnel or institutions, family members, legal requirements, or third parties concerned with public policy or religious/ideological/political interests. Issues of physician assistance in dying and medical futility are considered. The basis and the current legal status of these rights is examined, and it is concluded that threats to the autonomy of patients, to the privacy of the doctor/patient relationship, and to the quality of medical care should be taken seriously by individuals, medical practitioners, and others concerned with developing and maintaining reasonable, effective, and ethical health care policy.

摘要

本文探讨了在涉及医护人员或机构、家庭成员、法律要求或关注公共政策或宗教/意识形态/政治利益的第三方就这些问题存在冲突的情况下,个体患者拒绝、撤回或坚持接受医疗治疗的权利。文中还考虑了医生协助死亡和医疗无效性的问题。审视了这些权利的依据和当前法律地位,并得出结论:个人、医疗从业者以及其他参与制定和维护合理、有效且符合伦理的医疗保健政策的相关方,都应认真对待对患者自主权、医患关系隐私以及医疗质量的威胁。

相似文献

1
Legal and policy lessons from the Schiavo case: is our right to choose the medical care we want seriously at risk?从夏沃案中汲取的法律与政策教训:我们选择自己所需医疗护理的权利是否真的面临严重风险?
Palliat Support Care. 2006 Jun;4(2):145-53. doi: 10.1017/s1478951506060202.
2
Ethical and Legal Considerations in End-of-Life Care.临终关怀中的伦理与法律考量
Prim Care. 2019 Sep;46(3):387-398. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
3
Concepts and debates in end-of-life care.临终关怀中的概念与争论。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2012 Jul-Sep;9(3):202-6. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2012.066.
4
[Implementation of the French law related to the patients' rights and the end of life].[法国与患者权利及生命终结相关法律的实施]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2006 May;25(5):491-2. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 Apr 4.
5
[Refractory sufferings at the end of life: Which considerations, which propositions?].[生命末期的难治性痛苦:哪些考量,哪些建议?]
Presse Med. 2011 Apr;40(4 Pt 1):341-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2010.11.012. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
6
Medically assisted dying.医疗协助死亡
N Z Med J. 2012 Jan 25;126(1368):86-8.
7
[Withholding and withdrawing treatment, ethical and legal aspects].[治疗的 withhold 与 withdraw,伦理和法律层面] (注:这里“withhold”和“withdraw”在医学语境中可能有特定含义,比如 withhold 可能指 withholding treatment 即“ withhold 治疗”(可能是暂停、不给予等意思),withdraw 可能指 withdrawing treatment 即“撤回治疗”等,但仅根据所给英文难以确切完整翻译出准确医学含义,按字面翻译如上)
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 Jun 14;127(12):1648-50.
8
Does Declaration of Brain Death Serve the Best Interest of Organ Donors Rather Than Merely Facilitating Organ Transplantation?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jun;101(6):2053-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.100. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
9
When hope fades.
Tex Med. 2006 Oct;102(10):33-6.
10
[Limiting life sustaining therapies].[限制维持生命的治疗方法]
Rev Mal Respir. 2006 Sep;23(4 Suppl):13S29-45.