Suppr超能文献

关节镜下肩袖修复中缝线构型的强度

The strength of suture configurations in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

作者信息

White Clive D, Bunker Timothy D, Hooper Robert M

机构信息

Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, Devon EX2 5DW, England.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2006 Aug;22(8):837-41. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.093.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the strength of different suture configurations with the use of a recently introduced arthroscopic suture passer (ExpressSew; Surgical Solutions, Valencia, CA).

METHODS

The ultimate tensile strength and mode of failure of each suture configuration were repeatedly tested on a validated porcine rotator cuff tendon model, with the use of standard suture material (No. 2 FiberWire [Arthrex, Naples, FL]) passed with ExpressSew and tested on a Hounsfield digital tensiometer type H20K-W (Tinius Olsen, Hersham, PA).

RESULTS

The strongest construct was 2 mattress sutures (mean, 169 N; standard deviation, 56.1 N); this was followed in strength by a single modified Kessler suture (mean, 161 N; standard deviation, 16.9 N), 4 simple sutures (mean, 155 N; standard deviation, 27.3 N), and finally, a single Mason-Allen suture (mean, 140 N; standard deviation, 28.6 N).

CONCLUSIONS

Study results show little difference in strength for varying complexities of suture configurations. In simple terms, no demonstrable difference was seen in the strength of construct, whether the surgeon used 4 simple sutures, 2 mattress sutures, or 1 grasping suture.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study allows the surgeon to justify use of the simplest configuration of suture passage that works in his hands, for the purpose of attaining a reliable and repeatable repair of the rotator cuff through arthroscopic methods.

摘要

目的

本研究使用最近推出的关节镜缝合器(ExpressSew;外科解决方案公司,加利福尼亚州瓦伦西亚)评估不同缝合方式的强度。

方法

在经过验证的猪肩袖肌腱模型上,反复测试每种缝合方式的极限拉伸强度和失效模式,使用标准缝合材料(2号FiberWire[Arthrex,佛罗里达州那不勒斯])通过ExpressSew传递,并在Hounsfield数字张力计H20K-W型(Tinius Olsen,宾夕法尼亚州赫舍姆)上进行测试。

结果

最强的结构是2条褥式缝合线(平均值169 N;标准差56.1 N);其次是单条改良凯斯勒缝合线(平均值161 N;标准差16.9 N)、4条单纯缝合线(平均值155 N;标准差27.3 N),最后是单条梅森-艾伦缝合线(平均值140 N;标准差28.6 N)。

结论

研究结果表明,不同复杂程度的缝合方式在强度上差异不大。简单来说,无论外科医生使用4条单纯缝合线、2条褥式缝合线还是1条抓持缝合线,在结构强度上均未观察到明显差异。

临床意义

本研究使外科医生能够证明,为了通过关节镜方法实现可靠且可重复的肩袖修复,使用其手中最简单的缝合方式是合理的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验