Yadav Hemang, Nho Shane, Romeo Anthony, MacGillivray John D
The Hospital for Special Surgery, Office of Dr. John MacGillivray, Cornell University, East River Professional Building, 523 East 72nd Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Apr;17(4):409-21. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0686-8. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
By virtue of its anatomy and function, the rotator cuff is vulnerable to considerable morbidity, often necessitating surgical intervention. The factors contributing to cuff disease can be divided into those extrinsic to the rotator cuff (most notably impingement) and those intrinsic to the cuff (age-related degeneration, hypovascularity and inflammation amongst others). In an era of emerging biologic interventions, our interventions are increasingly being modulated by our understanding of these core processes, many of which remain uncertain today. When we do intervene surgically, the techniques we employ are particularly challenging in the context of the tremendous pace of advancement. Several recent studies have shown that arthroscopic repair gives similar functional results to that of mini-open and open procedures, with all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. However, the 'best' repair construct remains unknown, with wide variations in surgeon preference. Here we present a literature review encompassing recent developments in our understanding of basic science in rotator cuff disease as well as an up-to-date evidence-based comparison of different techniques available to the surgeon for cuff repair.
由于其解剖结构和功能,肩袖容易出现相当严重的病变,常常需要进行手术干预。导致肩袖疾病的因素可分为肩袖外部因素(最显著的是撞击)和肩袖内部因素(如年龄相关退变、血供不足和炎症等)。在生物干预不断涌现的时代,我们的干预措施越来越受到对这些核心过程理解的影响,而其中许多过程至今仍不明确。当我们进行手术干预时,在进步速度极快的背景下,我们采用的技术极具挑战性。最近的几项研究表明,关节镜修复与小切口开放手术和开放手术的功能效果相似,具有微创手术的所有优点。然而,“最佳”修复结构仍然未知,外科医生的偏好差异很大。在此,我们进行文献综述,涵盖我们对肩袖疾病基础科学理解的最新进展,以及对外科医生可用于肩袖修复的不同技术的最新循证比较。