Hummelen Benjamin, Wilberg Theresa, Pedersen Geir, Karterud Sigmund
Department for Research and Education, Psychiatric Division, Ullevål University Hospital, 0407 Oslo, Norway.
Compr Psychiatry. 2006 Sep-Oct;47(5):376-83. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2006.01.006. Epub 2006 Apr 21.
This study investigated several aspects of the validity of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition avoidant personality disorder (APD) construct, with emphasis on the psychometric properties of the diagnostic criteria and the prototype nature of the construct. A sample of 1,058 patients from the Norwegian Network of Psychotherapeutic Day Hospitals was examined by means of exploratory factor analysis, correlation, and diagnostic efficiency statistics, chi(2) analysis, and frequency distribution. The results indicated that APD is a 1-dimensional construct with good internal consistency. The criteria had acceptable diagnostic efficiency; criterion 3 performed poorest. Number of APD criteria showed no distinct threshold between No-APD and patients with APD. Sixty-two different combinations of any 4 APD criteria occurred. It can be concluded that the prototype model fitted the data well and that the APD diagnostic criteria perform well in the current classification system. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition hierarchy of criteria was not supported.
本研究调查了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版中回避型人格障碍(APD)结构有效性的几个方面,重点关注诊断标准的心理测量特性以及该结构的原型性质。通过探索性因素分析、相关性分析、诊断效率统计、卡方分析和频率分布,对来自挪威心理治疗日间医院网络的1058名患者样本进行了检查。结果表明,APD是一个具有良好内部一致性的一维结构。这些标准具有可接受的诊断效率;标准3表现最差。APD标准的数量在非APD患者和APD患者之间没有明显的阈值。出现了62种任意4条APD标准的不同组合。可以得出结论,原型模型与数据拟合良好,并且APD诊断标准在当前分类系统中表现良好。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版的标准层次结构未得到支持。