Fong A D, Handlogten M E, Kilberg M S
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, J. Hillis Miller Health Center, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville 32610.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990 Mar;1022(3):325-32. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(90)90281-r.
Substrate-dependent regulation of amino acid transport by System A occurs by both direct action at the carrier (trans-inhibition) and transcriptional control (adaptive regulation). While experiments with intact cells have led to working models that describe these regulatory phenomena, the use of subcellular approaches will serve to refine the present hypotheses. Adaptive induction of System A transport following amino acid starvation of cells was shown to be dependent on de novo RNA and protein synthesis, and the stimulated activity was shown to be retained in isolated plasma membrane vesicles. This stimulated transport activity was tightly associated with the plasma membrane, but could be solubilized by 4 M urea and 2.5% cholate, and recovered following reconstitution of the protein into artificial proteoliposomes. These data support the working hypothesis that adaptive induction of transport is the result of de novo synthesis and insertion into the plasma membrane of System A carrier protein. In contrast, the activity of System ASC in the vesicles from the amino acid starved cells was actually reduced by 2-5-fold when compared to amino acid-fed cells. A more rapid form of regulation of System A activity is trans-inhibition. The use of isolated plasma membrane vesicles demonstrated that trans-inhibition in whole cells did not survive membrane isolation. However, substrate loading of isolated membrane vesicles containing high levels of System A activity, produced trans-inhibition in a very specific manner in that System A substrates resulted in decreased transport activity, while those amino acids which are poor substrates for the System A carrier did not. Thus, trans-inhibition is not the result of a recycling process involving an intracellular pool of carriers, but rather can be accounted for by differences in the kinetics for amino acid binding and/or translocation on the two sides of the membrane.
系统A对氨基酸转运的底物依赖性调节通过载体上的直接作用(反式抑制)和转录控制(适应性调节)两种方式进行。虽然对完整细胞的实验已得出描述这些调节现象的工作模型,但使用亚细胞方法将有助于完善当前的假说。细胞氨基酸饥饿后系统A转运的适应性诱导被证明依赖于从头合成RNA和蛋白质,并且刺激后的活性在分离的质膜囊泡中得以保留。这种刺激后的转运活性与质膜紧密相关,但可被4M尿素和2.5%胆酸盐溶解,并在将蛋白质重新组装到人工脂质体后恢复。这些数据支持了一个工作假说,即转运的适应性诱导是系统A载体蛋白从头合成并插入质膜的结果。相比之下,与氨基酸喂养的细胞相比,氨基酸饥饿细胞的囊泡中系统ASC的活性实际上降低了2至5倍。系统A活性的一种更快的调节形式是反式抑制。使用分离的质膜囊泡表明,全细胞中的反式抑制在膜分离后无法保留。然而,对含有高水平系统A活性的分离膜囊泡进行底物加载,以一种非常特定的方式产生了反式抑制,即系统A底物导致转运活性降低,而那些作为系统A载体不良底物的氨基酸则不会。因此,反式抑制不是涉及细胞内载体池的循环过程的结果,而是可以由膜两侧氨基酸结合和/或转运动力学的差异来解释。