Ferrell C L, Berry E D, Freetly H C, Miller D N
USDA-ARS, US Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2006 Sep;84(9):2515-22. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-746.
Although Brahman crosses constitute a large portion of US beef cattle, little information is available on their response to diverse feed resources compared with Bos taurus steers. Thus, the objectives were to evaluate genotype and diet effects on steer performance during the growing period and subsequent response to a high grain diet during the finishing period. Fifty-one steers [0 (15), 1/4 (20), 1/2 (7), and 3/4 Brahman (9), with the remaining proportion being MARC III] were allotted to 8 pens. Beginning on December 2, steers were individually fed chopped bromegrass hay (n = 26; DM = 85%, CP = 9.5%, ME = 2.19 Mcal/kg) or a corn silage-based diet (n = 25; DM = 51%, CP = 11.9%, ME = 2.75 Mcal/kg) for 119 d. All steers were then fed a high corn diet (DM = 79%, CP = 11.7%, ME = 3.08 Mcal/kg) to a target BW of 560 kg (176 d). Data were analyzed by ANOVA, with genotype, growing diet, and the 2-way interaction included. The interaction was not significant (P > 0.25). The MARC III and 1/2 Brahman steers weighed more (P < 0.01) than 1/4 or 3/4 Brahman steers initially and at the end of the growing period. Weight of bromegrass-fed (325 kg) steers was less than that of corn silage-fed (384 kg) steers at the end of the growing period. Steer ADG and intake of DM, CP, and ME were less (P = 0.087 to 0.001) for 1/4 and 3/4 Brahman than for 0 or 1/2 Brahman steers during growing, finishing, and total, but efficiency of gain did not differ (P > 0.10). Carcass weight, marbling score, quality grade (P < 0.05), and kidney fat (P = 0.06) differed among genotypes. Daily DMI (6.91 vs. 7.06 kg) was similar, but CP (0.66 vs. 0.84 kg) and ME (15.2 vs. 19.4 Mcal) intake of bromegrass fed was less (P = 0.001) than those of corn silage-fed steers. Values for DMI/gain (22.3 vs. 7.43 kg/kg), CP intake/gain (2.13 vs. 0.88 kg/kg), and ME intake/gain (48.8 vs. 20.4 Mcal/kg) were greater (P < 0.001) in bromegrass-fed than corn silage-fed steers. Over the total study, ADG was lower (0.96 vs. 1.01 kg), and DMI (7.82 vs. 7.19 kg), DMI/gain (8.21 vs. 7.10 kg/kg), and ME intake/gain (22.6 vs. 20.9 Mcal/kg) were greater (P < 0.05) in bromegrass-fed than in corn silage-fed steers. Carcass weight, dressing percent, adjusted backfat, and yield grade (P < 0.05) were greater for corn silage-fed than for bromegrass-fed steers. Feed intake and performance, but not efficiency, differed among these genotypes. Compensatory performance during finishing was insufficient to overcome reduced performance during the growing period.
尽管婆罗门牛杂交种在美国肉牛中占很大比例,但与欧洲牛阉牛相比,关于它们对各种饲料资源反应的信息却很少。因此,本研究的目的是评估基因型和日粮对生长期阉牛生长性能的影响,以及后期育肥期对高谷物日粮的反应。51头阉牛[0(15头)、1/4(20头)、1/2(7头)和3/4婆罗门牛(9头),其余比例为MARC III]被分配到8个栏中。从12月2日开始,阉牛分别饲喂切碎的雀麦干草(n = 26;干物质= 85%,粗蛋白= 9.5%,代谢能= 2.19兆卡/千克)或玉米青贮日粮(n = 25;干物质= 51%,粗蛋白= 11.9%,代谢能= 2.75兆卡/千克),持续119天。然后所有阉牛都饲喂高玉米日粮(干物质= 79%,粗蛋白= 11.7%,代谢能= 3.08兆卡/千克),直至达到目标体重560千克(176天)。数据采用方差分析进行分析,包括基因型、生长期日粮以及二者的双向交互作用。交互作用不显著(P > 0.25)。MARC III和1/2婆罗门牛阉牛最初和生长期结束时的体重比1/4或3/4婆罗门牛阉牛更重(P < 0.01)。生长期结束时,饲喂雀麦干草的阉牛体重(325千克)低于饲喂玉米青贮的阉牛(384千克)。在生长、育肥和整个阶段,1/4和3/4婆罗门牛阉牛的平均日增重(ADG)以及干物质、粗蛋白和代谢能摄入量均低于0或1/2婆罗门牛阉牛(P = 0.087至0.001),但增重效率无差异(P > 0.10)。不同基因型的胴体重、大理石花纹评分、质量等级(P < 0.05)和肾脂含量(P = 0.06)存在差异。饲喂雀麦干草的阉牛每日干物质采食量(6.91千克对7.06千克)相似,但粗蛋白摄入量(0.66千克对0.84千克)和代谢能摄入量(15.2兆卡对19.4兆卡)低于饲喂玉米青贮的阉牛(P = 0.001)。饲喂雀麦干草的阉牛干物质采食量/增重(DM/gain)(22.3千克/千克对7.43千克/千克)、粗蛋白摄入量/增重(CP intake/gain)(2.13千克/千克对0.88千克/千克)和代谢能摄入量/增重(ME intake/gain)(48.8兆卡/千克对20.4兆卡/千克)均高于饲喂玉米青贮的阉牛(P < 0.001)。在整个研究期间,饲喂雀麦干草的阉牛平均日增重较低(0.96千克对1.01千克),干物质采食量(7.82千克对7.19千克)、干物质采食量/增重(8.21千克/千克对7.10千克/千克)和代谢能摄入量/增重(22.6兆卡/千克对20.9兆卡/千克)均高于饲喂玉米青贮的阉牛(P < 0.05)。饲喂玉米青贮的阉牛胴体重、屠宰率、校正背膘厚和产肉等级(P < 0.05)均高于饲喂雀麦干草的阉牛。这些基因型之间的采食量和性能存在差异,但效率无差异。育肥期的补偿生长性能不足以克服生长期性能的降低。