Suppr超能文献

重度抑郁症的诊断VI:客观测试作为诊断标准的性能

Diagnosing major depressive disorder VI: performance of an objective test as a diagnostic criterion.

作者信息

Zimmerman Mark, Chelminski Iwona, McGlinchey Joseph B, Young Diane

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University School of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006 Aug;194(8):565-9. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000230393.19478.d5.

Abstract

Considerable research has evaluated biological and psychological tests for various psychiatric disorders; however, few objective tests are included in DSM-IV as diagnostic criteria. It was recently suggested that existing tests are insufficiently accurate to be included as diagnostic criteria. While it is true that there are limitations in the sensitivity and/or specificity of such tests, this should not rule them out as effective diagnostic criteria. Studies examining the diagnostic efficiency of the DSM criteria sets demonstrate that the individual criteria vary in their sensitivity and specificity. In the present article, we suggest that the same standard should be applied to the evaluation of objective tests. That is, we suggest changing the perspective used to evaluate the performance of biological and psychological measures from the traditional one examining them as diagnostic tests to one in which these measures are evaluated as diagnostic criteria. To our knowledge, no previous investigators have compared the psychometric performance of an objective test to the psychometric performance of the DSM-IV symptom criteria. The recent report from the committee to develop a research agenda for the initial planning phase for DSM-V discussed the use of self-report symptom scales as possible diagnostic criteria in nonpsychiatric settings. In the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services project, we examined the performance of a self-report depression questionnaire as a diagnostic criterion for major depressive disorder (MDD). We compared the performance of the Diagnostic Inventory for Depression to the performance of the DSM-IV MDD symptom criteria in 1138 psychiatric outpatients. The results indicated that the diagnostic efficiency of the Diagnostic Inventory for Depression was similar to the loss of interest or pleasure criterion, and superior to all of the remaining DSM-IV MDD symptom criteria except low mood. We discuss issues related to the possible use of a self-administered depression symptom scale as a diagnostic criterion.

摘要

大量研究对各种精神障碍的生物学和心理学测试进行了评估;然而,《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)作为诊断标准纳入的客观测试却很少。最近有人提出,现有的测试准确性不足,无法作为诊断标准。诚然,此类测试在敏感性和/或特异性方面存在局限性,但这不应将它们排除在有效的诊断标准之外。研究DSM标准集诊断效率的研究表明,各个标准在敏感性和特异性方面存在差异。在本文中,我们建议应将相同的标准应用于客观测试的评估。也就是说,我们建议改变用于评估生物学和心理学测量方法性能的视角,从传统的将它们作为诊断测试进行检验,转变为将这些测量方法作为诊断标准进行评估。据我们所知,此前没有研究者将客观测试的心理测量性能与DSM-IV症状标准的心理测量性能进行比较。为DSM-V初始规划阶段制定研究议程的委员会最近的报告讨论了在非精神科环境中使用自我报告症状量表作为可能的诊断标准。在罗德岛改善诊断评估和服务方法项目的本报告中,我们检验了一份自我报告抑郁问卷作为重度抑郁症(MDD)诊断标准的性能。我们在1138名精神科门诊患者中比较了抑郁诊断量表的性能与DSM-IV中MDD症状标准的性能。结果表明,抑郁诊断量表的诊断效率与兴趣或愉悦感丧失标准相似,并且优于除情绪低落之外的所有其他DSM-IV MDD症状标准。我们讨论了与将自我管理的抑郁症状量表用作诊断标准的可能性相关的问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验