Romano Fabrizio, Caprotti Roberto, Conti Matteo, Piacentini Maria Gaia, Uggeri Fabio, Motta Vittorio, Pogliani Enrico Maria, Uggeri Franco
Department of Surgery (Chirurgia I), San Gerardo Hospital, II University of Milan-Bicocca, Via Donizetti 106, 20052 Monza, Italy.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006 Sep;391(5):483-8. doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0075-z. Epub 2006 Aug 15.
Thrombosis of the portal system is a potentially life-threatening complication after splenectomy. The reported incidence is low (approximately or = 1%), however may be underestimated due to difficult in making the diagnosis. The factors associated with its development and the clinical outcome are poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, risk factors, treatment, and outcome in series of consecutive cases.
All patients who had undergone a splenectomy (both open and laparoscopic) between January 1997 and December 2004 at the Department of Surgery of University of Milan Bicocca were retrospectively reviewed. Twelve cases of thrombosis (7.6%) among 158 splenectomies were identified. No significant differences were noted in age, gender, and surgical approach between patients who developed thrombosis and those who did not. Indication for splenectomy in patients with thrombosis were myeloproliferative disorders (n=5), hemolytic disease (n=4), and lymphoproliferative disorder (n=3). All patients had splenomegaly (mean 1.380 kg, range 0.400-3.120 kg).
Among patients with myeloproliferative disorders, five (33%) developed the complication, compared with 4 of 35 (11.5%) with hemolytic disease. Patients with both splenic weight >2.500 kg and myeloproliferative disorders had 80% incidence of portal thrombosis. Preoperative prophylactic anticoagulant therapy with low molecular weight heparin was administered in each case. All these patients had fever, abdominal pain, or leukocytosis. All diagnoses were made by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan and ecocolordoppler ultrasonography, and anticoagulation therapy was initiated immediately. Treatment within 15 days after splenectomy was successful in all patients, while delayed treatment was ineffective.
Portal thrombosis should be suspected in patients with fever or abdominal pain after splenectomy. Patients with myeloproliferative disorders and hemolytic diseases are at higher risk, as well as patients with marked splenomegaly. A high index of suspicion, early diagnosis, and prompt anticoagulation therapy are the keys to a successful outcome.
门静脉系统血栓形成是脾切除术后一种潜在的危及生命的并发症。报道的发病率较低(约1%或更低),然而由于诊断困难,实际发病率可能被低估。与其发生发展相关的因素以及临床结局目前仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估一系列连续病例中的发病率、危险因素、治疗方法及结局。
回顾性分析1997年1月至2004年12月在米兰比可卡大学外科接受脾切除术(包括开放手术和腹腔镜手术)的所有患者。在158例脾切除术中,确诊12例血栓形成(7.6%)。发生血栓形成的患者与未发生血栓形成的患者在年龄、性别和手术方式方面无显著差异。血栓形成患者行脾切除术的指征为骨髓增殖性疾病(n = 5)、溶血性疾病(n = 4)和淋巴增殖性疾病(n = 3)。所有患者均有脾肿大(平均1.380 kg,范围0.400 - 3.120 kg)。
在骨髓增殖性疾病患者中,5例(33%)发生了该并发症,而在35例溶血性疾病患者中有4例(11.5%)发生。脾重量>2.500 kg且患有骨髓增殖性疾病的患者门静脉血栓形成发生率为80%。每例患者术前均给予低分子量肝素预防性抗凝治疗。所有这些患者均有发热、腹痛或白细胞增多。所有诊断均通过增强计算机断层扫描(CT)和彩色多普勒超声检查做出,并立即开始抗凝治疗。脾切除术后15天内进行治疗的所有患者均获成功,而延迟治疗无效。
脾切除术后出现发热或腹痛的患者应怀疑门静脉血栓形成。骨髓增殖性疾病和溶血性疾病患者以及脾肿大明显的患者风险更高。高度的怀疑指数、早期诊断和及时的抗凝治疗是取得成功结局的关键。