• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Gout Assessment Questionnaire: Initial results of reliability, validity and responsiveness.

作者信息

Colwell H H, Hunt B J, Pasta D J, Palo W A, Mathias S D, Joseph-Ridge N

机构信息

Ovation Research Group, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Oct;60(10):1210-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01104.x. Epub 2006 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01104.x
PMID:16911575
Abstract

We evaluated the psychometric properties of a new gout-specific patient reported outcomes questionnaire. The Gout Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ) and the SF-36 were administered to 126 subjects in a multicenter Phase II program of febuxostat, an investigational treatment for hyperuricemia (serum uric acid >8.0 mg/dl) in patients with chronic gout. The questionnaire was administered at baseline and 1, 6 and 12 months later. The majority of subjects, mean age 54 years, were male, Caucasian and had experienced a gout flare within the last year. Seven domains were identified, all met criteria for reliability and validity. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.78 to 0.97. Pearson correlations between GAQ and SF-36 scales were generally low to moderate, with the highest correlation between Gout Pain and Severity and SF-36 Bodily Pain, r = 0.45. Guyatt's statistic (measure of responsiveness) ranged from 0.24 to 1.00 at 12 months. Minimal clinically important differences ranged from 2 (Gout Concern) to 10 points (Productivity). The GAQ has acceptable psychometric properties. Further research is required to confirm results, which may provide more information to improve the GAQ for use in clinical trials.

摘要

相似文献

1
Gout Assessment Questionnaire: Initial results of reliability, validity and responsiveness.
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Oct;60(10):1210-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01104.x. Epub 2006 Aug 15.
2
Validation of the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index in patients with gout.痛风患者健康评估问卷残疾指数的验证
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May 15;59(5):665-9. doi: 10.1002/art.23575.
3
Quality of life and disability in patients with treatment-failure gout.治疗失败的痛风患者的生活质量与残疾情况
J Rheumatol. 2009 May;36(5):1041-8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.071229. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
4
The lower-limb tasks questionnaire: an assessment of validity, reliability, responsiveness, and minimal important differences.下肢任务问卷:效度、信度、反应度及最小重要差异评估
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Aug;88(8):993-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.008.
5
Psychometric properties of MacNew Heart Disease Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire: Brazilian version.MacNew心脏病健康相关生活质量问卷的心理测量特性:巴西版本。
J Adv Nurs. 2009 May;65(5):1084-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04962.x. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
6
Development of the Italian version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale, NPDS-I: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity.意大利版颈部疼痛与功能障碍量表(NPDS-I)的研制:跨文化调适、信度与效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 1;33(13):E429-34. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318175c2b0.
7
[Disease-specific Questionnaire for Quality of Life in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease in the Stage of Critical Ischemia (FLeQKI)--methodical development of a specific measuring instrument and psychometric evaluation of its validity and reliability (Part 1)].[重症缺血期外周动脉闭塞性疾病患者生活质量疾病特异性问卷(FLeQKI)——一种特定测量工具的方法学开发及其效度和信度的心理测量学评估(第1部分)]
Rofo. 2007 Dec;179(12):1251-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963515. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
8
A self-administered questionnaire of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.一份关于肘部尺神经病变的自填式调查问卷。
Neurol Sci. 2006 Dec;27(6):402-11. doi: 10.1007/s10072-006-0719-3.
9
Development of the Italian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-I): A cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study.意大利版奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI-I)的开发:一项跨文化适应、信效度研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 1;34(19):2090-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa1e6b.
10
Acceptability and psychometric properties of the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire among patients undergoing heart valve surgery: validation and comparison with SF-36.心脏瓣膜手术患者中明尼苏达心力衰竭生活问卷的可接受性和心理测量特性:与SF-36的验证及比较
J Card Fail. 2009 Apr;15(3):267-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.10.003. Epub 2008 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
High vegetable consumption and regular exercise are associated with better quality of life in patients with gout.高蔬菜摄入量和定期运动与痛风患者的生活质量改善相关。
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Sep;39(5):845-854. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.476. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
2
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Gout Impact Scale.痛风影响量表韩国版的信度和效度。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Sep 4;38(35):e266. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e266.
3
Gender differences in illness perceptions and disease management in patients with gout, results from a questionnaire study in Western Sweden.
性别差异在痛风患者的疾病认知和疾病管理中的作用:来自瑞典西部的问卷调查研究结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 15;24(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06416-8.
4
Translation, internal consistency, reliability and validity of the Thai version of Gout Assessment Questionnaire version 2.0 (GAQ 2.0).泰语版痛风评估问卷 2.0 版(GAQ 2.0)的翻译、内部一致性、信度和效度。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Jul;41(7):2129-2141. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06148-5. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
5
Development and validation of a patient-reported gout attack intensity score for use in gout clinical studies.开发和验证一种用于痛风临床研究的患者报告的痛风发作严重程度评分。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Nov 1;58(11):1928-1934. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez064.
6
Patient-reported gout attack frequency and allopurinol use in general practice in the Netherlands: a prospective observational cohort study protocol.患者报告的痛风发作频率和荷兰普通实践中的别嘌醇使用:一项前瞻性观察队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 25;8(11):e024335. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024335.
7
Pilot study of a multidisciplinary gout patient education and monitoring program.多学科痛风患者教育与监测项目的初步研究。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Apr;46(5):601-608. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
8
What Outcomes are Important for Gout Patients? In-Depth Qualitative Research into the Gout Patient Experience to Determine Optimal Endpoints for Evaluating Therapeutic Interventions.哪些结果对痛风患者很重要?对痛风患者体验进行深入定性研究以确定评估治疗干预措施的最佳终点。
Patient. 2017 Feb;10(1):65-79. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0184-x.
9
Discrepancies in how the impact of gout is assessed in outcomes research compared to how health professionals view the impact of gout, using the lens of the International Classification of Functioning, Health and Disability (ICF).从《国际功能、健康和残疾分类》(ICF)的角度来看,与卫生专业人员对痛风影响的看法相比,痛风影响在结果研究中的评估方式存在差异。
Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Sep;35(9):2259-68. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3325-7. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
10
Patient-reported outcomes in core domain sets for rheumatic diseases.风湿病核心领域患者报告结局研究。
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015 Dec;11(12):705-12. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.116. Epub 2015 Sep 1.