Goyal R, Singh N P, Kumar A, Kaur I, Singh M, Sunita N, Mathur M
Department of Microbiology, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, New Delhi - 110 095, India.
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006 Jul;24(3):201-4.
An attempt was made to speciate 102 clinically significant isolates of coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) by a practical scheme adapted from various references. This scheme utilizes slide and tube coagulase test, urease test ornithine decarboxylase, novobiocin susceptibility and aerobic acid from mannose for assigning species group. Inclusion of one or two additional tests in a species group could identify the isolates to species level. Ninety eight (97%) isolates were conveniently identified as S. epidermidis (41%), S. saprophyticus (16.6%), S. haemolyticus (14.7%), S. hominis (14.7%), S. lugdunensis (4.9%), S. schleiferi (1.9%) and S. capitis (1.9%). Only four isolates were not identified to the species level, two of which were probably S. capitis subspecies ureolyticus / S. warneri / S. simulans . Antibiotic susceptibility testing showed maximum resistance to ampicillin (89%) followed by cefotaxime (59%) with no resistance to vancomycin. The increasing recognition of pathogenic potential of CoNS and emergence of drug resistance amongst them denotes the need to adopt simple laboratory procedures to identify and understand the diversity of staphylococci isolated from clinical material.
我们尝试采用一种根据各种参考文献改编的实用方案,对102株具有临床意义的凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS)进行菌种鉴定。该方案利用玻片和试管凝固酶试验、尿素酶试验、鸟氨酸脱羧酶试验、新生霉素敏感性试验以及甘露糖产酸试验来划分菌种类别。在一个菌种类别中增加一两项额外试验,就能够将分离株鉴定到种的水平。98株(97%)分离株被顺利鉴定为表皮葡萄球菌(41%)、腐生葡萄球菌(16.6%)、溶血葡萄球菌(14.7%)、人葡萄球菌(14.7%)、路邓葡萄球菌(4.9%)、施氏葡萄球菌(1.9%)和头葡萄球菌(1.9%)。只有4株分离株未鉴定到种的水平,其中两株可能是解脲头葡萄球菌亚种/沃纳葡萄球菌/模仿葡萄球菌。药敏试验显示,分离株对氨苄西林的耐药率最高(89%),其次是头孢噻肟(59%),对万古霉素无耐药。人们对CoNS致病潜力认识的不断提高以及它们中耐药性的出现,表明需要采用简单的实验室程序来鉴定和了解从临床材料中分离出的葡萄球菌的多样性。