Hardie Jason B, Pearce Robert A
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
J Neurosci. 2006 Aug 16;26(33):8559-69. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0547-06.2006.
The impact of synaptic inhibition depends on the passive and active properties of the neuronal membrane as well as on the characteristics of the underlying synaptic conductances. Here, we evaluated the contributions of these different factors to the IPSPs produced by two kinetically and anatomically distinct inhibitory synapses onto hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons: somatic GABA(A,fast) and dendritic GABA(A,slow). Using combined current-clamp and voltage-clamp recordings from neurons in hippocampal brain slices, we found that despite pronounced differences in kinetics and only weak voltage dependence of the underlying synaptic conductances, there were much smaller differences in duration but strong voltage dependence of IPSPs arising from somatic and dendritic synapses. Pharmacologic tests and compartmental modeling showed that these effects were produced by the hyperpolarization-activated cation current, I(H), which accelerated IPSP decay over a broad range of membrane potentials and reduced IPSP amplitudes at hyperpolarized potentials, and the persistent sodium current, I(NaP), which prolonged and amplified IPSPs at depolarized subthreshold potentials. The relative magnitudes of their influences depended on the kinetics of the underlying synaptic conductances: the effect on duration was greater for GABA(A,fast) and on amplitude was greater for GABA(A,slow). Passive and active factors thus influence the impact of synaptic inhibition in a location- and voltage-dependent manner.
突触抑制的影响取决于神经元膜的被动和主动特性以及潜在突触电导的特征。在这里,我们评估了这些不同因素对海马CA1锥体神经元上两种在动力学和解剖学上不同的抑制性突触产生的抑制性突触后电位(IPSPs)的贡献:体细胞GABA(A,快速型)和树突状GABA(A,慢速型)。通过对海马脑片神经元进行电流钳和电压钳联合记录,我们发现,尽管潜在突触电导在动力学上有明显差异且电压依赖性较弱,但体细胞和树突状突触产生的IPSPs在持续时间上差异较小,但在电压依赖性方面较强。药理学测试和房室模型表明,这些效应是由超极化激活的阳离子电流I(H)产生的,I(H)在广泛的膜电位范围内加速IPSP衰减,并在超极化电位下降低IPSP幅度,以及由持续性钠电流I(NaP)产生的,I(NaP)在去极化阈下电位时延长并放大IPSPs。它们影响的相对大小取决于潜在突触电导的动力学:对持续时间的影响对于GABA(A,快速型)更大,而对幅度的影响对于GABA(A,慢速型)更大。因此,被动和主动因素以位置和电压依赖性方式影响突触抑制的作用。