Suppr超能文献

气道支架存在时支气管镜氩等离子体凝固术安全限度的体外研究

In vitro study of the safety limits of bronchoscopic argon plasma coagulation in the presence of airway stents.

作者信息

Colt Henri G, Crawford Stephen W

机构信息

Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Division, University of California-Irvine Medical Center, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, CA 92868-3298, USA.

出版信息

Respirology. 2006 Sep;11(5):643-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00890.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify the safety limits of bronchoscopic argon plasma coagulation (APC) around indwelling airway stents.

METHODOLOGY

This is an experimental in vitro study simulating a patient-care environment. Uncovered and covered Nitinol (Ultraflex), uncovered and covered Wallstent and studded silicone stents were deployed in the tracheobronchial tree of a ventilated and oxygenated heart-lung block from an expired pig. APC was performed at power settings of 40 and 80 W using F(I)O(2) of 0.21, 0.40 and 1.00 and an argon gas-flow rate of 0.8 L/min through a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope. The primary outcome was the time taken for the APC to cause stent damage. Stent damage was defined as discoloration, ignition or rupture.

RESULTS

Airway fires involving all five stents consistently occurred in the presence of 100% oxygen at powers of 40 W and 80 W. At lower F(I)O(2) (0.21 and 0.40) silicone stents were not damaged at 40 W and 80 W. Uncovered Ultraflex stents were undamaged using 40 W at either F(I)O(2) (0.21 and 0.40), but could be damaged using both F(I)O(2) levels when the power was increased to 80 W. Covered Ultraflex and both uncovered and covered Wallstents were damaged at both power settings (40 W and 80 W) and F(I)O(2) (0.21 and 0.40) levels, with a trend towards earlier damage using higher F(I)O(2) and power.

CONCLUSION

Working within the parameters identified in this study (power 40 W, F(I)O(2) 0.21, APC flow-rate 0.8 L/min), APC is a safe method for tissue devitalization and destruction and avoids the risk of airway stent ignition, especially if short bursts of APC are employed. The safety limits identified using an F(i)O(2) of 0.4, however, are also important because some patients undergoing resection may require oxygen therapy.

摘要

目的与背景

本研究旨在确定在气道内留置支架周围进行支气管镜氩等离子体凝固术(APC)的安全限度。

方法

这是一项模拟患者护理环境的体外实验研究。将未覆盖和覆盖的镍钛诺(Ultraflex)支架、未覆盖和覆盖的Wallstent支架以及带钉硅胶支架放置在一只死亡猪的通气且充氧的心肺阻滞模型的气管支气管树中。通过可弯曲纤维支气管镜,在功率设置为40瓦和80瓦、吸入氧分数(F(I)O(2))分别为0.21、0.40和1.00以及氩气流速为0.8升/分钟的条件下进行APC操作。主要观察指标是APC导致支架损坏所需的时间。支架损坏定义为变色、起火或破裂。

结果

在100%氧气环境下,功率为40瓦和80瓦时,所有五种支架均持续发生气道起火。在较低的F(I)O(2)(0.21和0.40)条件下,硅胶支架在40瓦和80瓦时未受损。未覆盖的Ultraflex支架在任一F(I)O(2)(0.21和0.40)条件下使用40瓦时未受损,但当功率增加到80瓦时,在两种F(I)O(2)水平下均可能受损。覆盖的Ultraflex支架以及未覆盖和覆盖的Wallstent支架在两种功率设置(40瓦和80瓦)以及F(I)O(2)(0.21和0.40)水平下均受损,且使用较高的F(I)O(2)和功率时,有更早出现损坏的趋势。

结论

在本研究确定的参数范围内(功率40瓦、F(I)O(2) 0.21、APC流速0.8升/分钟),APC是一种安全的组织失活和破坏方法,可避免气道支架起火的风险,特别是如果采用短时间的APC操作。然而,使用F(i)O(2)为0.4时确定的安全限度也很重要,因为一些接受切除术的患者可能需要氧疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验