Sachse S, von Suchodoletz W
Institut für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
Klin Padiatr. 2007 Mar-Apr;219(2):76-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-942174. Epub 2006 Aug 17.
Parents' questionnaires are assumed to be reliable instruments for early identification of language retardation. The general use of the ELFRA-2 in practice, however, is limited by its length. The goal of the study was to construct and to evaluate a short version.
The ELFRA-2 was sent to 1397 parents shortly before their child's second birthday. The return rate of the questionnaire was 71%. Questionnaires of monolingual German speaking children were included in the study (n=866) and randomly divided into two samples. From the first sample the most informative word categories were extracted by means of regression analysis and were used to compose a short form. With the second independent sample the validity of the short version was determined.
By means of stepwise regression analysis within the first sample a short version consisting of 42 items was developed. The correlation between scores of the short and the long version was high (r=0.95) and the classification (no language retardation vs. late talker) was congruent for most children. The sensitivity and the specifity of the short form were 83% and 97%, respectively. For the prediction of language impairment at the age of three years the short and the long version reached similar detection rates.
The results show that the validity of the short and the long form are comparable with respect to detection of late talkers. The time necessary to complete the short version allows its application during standard check-up examinations of children at the age of two years, and also to immediately discuss its result with the parents. Before the short form can be applied in pediatric practice, however, a standardization is necessary.
家长问卷被认为是早期识别语言发育迟缓的可靠工具。然而,ELFRA - 2在实际应用中因篇幅过长而受到限制。本研究的目的是构建并评估一个简短版本。
在孩子快两岁时,向1397名家长发放了ELFRA - 2问卷。问卷回收率为71%。研究纳入了说德语的单语儿童的问卷(n = 866),并随机分为两个样本。从第一个样本中,通过回归分析提取信息最丰富的单词类别,用于编制简短版本。利用第二个独立样本确定简短版本的有效性。
通过对第一个样本进行逐步回归分析,开发出了一个由42个项目组成的简短版本。简短版本和长版本得分之间的相关性很高(r = 0.95),大多数儿童的分类(无语言发育迟缓与说话晚)是一致的。简短版本的敏感性和特异性分别为83%和97%。对于预测三岁时的语言障碍,简短版本和长版本的检测率相似。
结果表明,在检测说话晚的儿童方面,简短版本和长版本的有效性相当。完成简短版本所需的时间使其能够在两岁儿童的标准体检中应用,并且可以立即与家长讨论结果。然而,在简短版本能够应用于儿科实践之前,有必要进行标准化。