Dickinson Helen
Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Health Soc Care Community. 2006 Sep;14(5):375-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00650.x.
At a time when health and social care partnerships are continuing to occupy a central role within the UK government's policy strategy, researchers are increasingly being required to evaluate such organisational entities. This paper looks at a wide range of approaches which have been utilised to evaluate health and social care partnerships, and suggests that theory-led strategies are better able to address the complexities associated with such forms of evaluation. In particular, the author suggests that a combination of theories of change and realistic evaluation seems to be the most fruitful in tackling the evaluation difficulties associated with partnerships. Despite both being theory-led evaluation strategies, they fulfil quite different and complementary roles. However, both these approaches have been found to have some limitations in practice. Therefore, this paper suggests that interpreting these approaches through a framework of critical realism may overcome a number of these difficulties.
在健康与社会护理伙伴关系在英国政府政策战略中持续占据核心地位之际,研究人员越来越需要对这类组织实体进行评估。本文探讨了用于评估健康与社会护理伙伴关系的广泛方法,并表明以理论为导向的策略更能应对此类评估形式所涉及的复杂性。特别是,作者认为变革理论与现实评估相结合似乎是解决与伙伴关系相关的评估难题最有效的方法。尽管两者都是以理论为导向的评估策略,但它们发挥着截然不同且相辅相成的作用。然而,实践中发现这两种方法都存在一些局限性。因此,本文建议通过批判实在论框架来解读这些方法,可能会克服其中的一些困难。