• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

领导在系统中断时的作用:健康和社会保健融合的定性研究。

The role of leadership in times of systems disruption: a qualitative study of health and social care integration.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 May 13;12(5):e054847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054847.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054847
PMID:35568492
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9108434/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To understand whether and how effective integration of health and social care might occur in the context of major system disruption (the COVID-19 pandemic), with a focus on how the initiative may overcome past barriers to integration.

DESIGN

Rapid, descriptive case study approach with deviant case sampling to gather and analyse key informant interviews and relevant archival documents.

SETTING

The innovation ('COVID-19 Protect') took place in Norfolk and Waveney, UK, and aimed to foster integration across highly diverse organisations, capitalising on existing digital technology to proactively identify and support individuals most at risk of severe illness from COVID-19.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-six key informants directly involved with project conceptualisation and early implementation. Participants included clinicians, executives, digital/information technology leads, and others. Final sample size was determined by theoretical saturation.

RESULTS

Four primary recurrent themes characterised the experiences of diverse team members in the project: (1) ways of working that supported rapid collaboration, (2) leveraging diversity and clinician input for systems change, (3) allowing for both central control and local adaptation and (4) balancing risk taking and accountability.

CONCLUSIONS

This rapid case study underscores the role of leadership in large systems change efforts, particularly in times of major disruption. Project leadership overcame barriers to integration highlighted by prior studies, including engaging with aversion to clinical/safety risk, fostering distributed leadership and developing shared organisational practices for data sharing and service delivery. These insights offer considerations for future efforts to support strategic integration of health and social care.

摘要

目的

了解在重大系统中断(COVID-19 大流行)背景下,健康和社会保健的有效整合是否以及如何发生,重点关注该倡议如何克服以往整合障碍。

设计

采用快速、描述性的案例研究方法,并采用离群案例抽样,以收集和分析主要知情人访谈和相关档案文件。

设置

该创新(“COVID-19 Protect”)发生在英国的诺福克和沃威尼地区,旨在促进高度多样化组织之间的整合,利用现有数字技术主动识别和支持最有可能因 COVID-19 而患上重病的个人。

参与者

26 名直接参与项目概念化和早期实施的主要知情人。参与者包括临床医生、管理人员、数字/信息技术负责人等。最终样本量由理论饱和度确定。

结果

四个主要的反复出现的主题描述了项目中不同团队成员的经验:(1)支持快速协作的工作方式,(2)利用多样性和临床医生的投入进行系统变革,(3)允许中央控制和地方适应,(4)平衡风险承担和问责制。

结论

这项快速案例研究强调了领导力在大型系统变革努力中的作用,尤其是在重大破坏时期。项目领导层克服了先前研究强调的整合障碍,包括应对对临床/安全风险的规避、培养分布式领导力以及为数据共享和服务提供开发共同的组织实践。这些见解为未来支持健康和社会保健的战略整合提供了考虑因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99df/9108434/04a1e4cbcee7/bmjopen-2021-054847f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99df/9108434/04a1e4cbcee7/bmjopen-2021-054847f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99df/9108434/04a1e4cbcee7/bmjopen-2021-054847f01.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of leadership in times of systems disruption: a qualitative study of health and social care integration.领导在系统中断时的作用:健康和社会保健融合的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 13;12(5):e054847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054847.
2
Leading through the first wave of COVID: a Canadian action research study.引领度过 COVID-19 第一波疫情:一项加拿大行动研究。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2021 Dec 15;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/LHS-05-2021-0042.
3
Integration of research and practice to improve public health and healthcare delivery through a collaborative 'Health Integration Team' model - a qualitative investigation.通过协作性“健康整合团队”模式整合研究与实践以改善公共卫生和医疗服务提供——一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun 22;16:201. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1445-z.
4
Collaboration over competition? Regulatory reform and inter-organisational relations in the NHS amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.合作优于竞争?新冠疫情期间英国国民保健制度中的监管改革与组织间关系:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 13;22(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08059-2.
5
More that unites us than divides us? A qualitative study of integration of community health and social care services.将社区卫生和社会保健服务整合起来的因素多于将其分开的因素?一项关于整合社区卫生和社会保健服务的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 May 29;21(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01168-z.
6
A thematic analysis of system wide learning from first wave Covid-19 in the East of England.英格兰东部第一波新冠疫情的系统范围学习的专题分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 25;22(1):552. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07797-7.
7
Pandemic Spiritual Leadership: A Trans-national Study of Innovation and Spiritual Practices.大流行时期的精神领导力:一项关于创新与精神实践的跨国研究。
Rev Relig Res. 2022;64(4):883-905. doi: 10.1007/s13644-022-00521-1. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
8
9
Realist evaluation of allied health management in Queensland: what works, in which contexts and why.昆士兰联合健康管理的现实主义评估:哪些措施有效、在何种背景下有效以及原因何在。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Aug;43(4):466-473. doi: 10.1071/AH17265.
10
Healthcare leaders' use of innovative solutions to ensure resilience in healthcare during the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study in Norwegian nursing homes and home care services.医疗保健领导者在新冠疫情期间使用创新解决方案确保医疗保健的韧性:挪威疗养院和家庭护理服务中的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 27;21(1):878. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06923-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Anxiety, concerns and COVID-19: Cross-country perspectives from families and individuals with neurodevelopmental conditions.焦虑、担忧和 COVID-19:来自有神经发育状况的家庭和个人的跨国视角。
J Glob Health. 2023 Jul 28;13:04081. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04081.

本文引用的文献

1
Conditions for successful interprofessional collaboration in integrated care - Lessons from a primary care setting in Denmark.成功开展整合照护跨专业合作的条件——丹麦初级医疗服务的经验教训。
Health Policy. 2021 Apr;125(4):474-481. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
2
Leadership in Integrated Care Networks: A Literature Review and Opportunities for Future Research.综合医疗网络中的领导力:文献综述与未来研究机会
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Aug 11;20(3):6. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5420.
3
COVID-19 - An Opportunity to Redesign Health Policy Thinking.
COVID-19——重新设计卫生政策思维的契机。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Apr 1;11(4):409-413. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.132.
4
Health system resilience: a literature review of empirical research.卫生系统韧性:实证研究的文献综述
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Oct 1;35(8):1084-1109. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa032.
5
COVID-19: Implications for the Support of People with Social Care Needs in England.COVID-19:对英格兰有社会护理需求人群支持的影响。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jul-Oct;32(4-5):365-372. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1759759. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
6
More that unites us than divides us? A qualitative study of integration of community health and social care services.将社区卫生和社会保健服务整合起来的因素多于将其分开的因素?一项关于整合社区卫生和社会保健服务的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 May 29;21(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01168-z.
7
Networked health care: Rethinking value creation in learning health care systems.网络化医疗保健:重新思考学习型医疗保健系统中的价值创造。
Learn Health Syst. 2019 Dec 5;4(2):e10212. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10212. eCollection 2020 Apr.
8
Covid-19: why we need a national health and social care service.新冠疫情:我们为何需要国家卫生与社会保健服务体系。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 14;369:m1465. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1465.
9
Leadership development in complex health systems: a qualitative study.复杂卫生系统中的领导力发展:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 6;10(4):e035797. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035797.
10
LAGOS: learning health systems and how they can integrate with patient care.拉各斯:学习型卫生系统以及它们如何与患者护理相结合。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Oct;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100037.