Miao G B, Liu J C, Liu M B, Wu J L, Zhang G, Chang J, Zhang L
Beijing Chaoyang Hospital-Affiliate of Capital University of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2006 Sep;36(9):614-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2006.01705.x.
Autoantibodies specific for the beta(1)-adrenoceptor (beta(1)-AR) have been implicated in the pathology of congestive heart failure (CHF). We hypothesized that the presence of autoantibodies against beta(1)-AR (anti-beta(1)-AR) is associated with left ventricular (LV) remodelling in response to metoprolol. Synthetic beta(1)-AR peptides served as the target antigen in an ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) were used to screen the sera of 106 CHF patients. Patients were separated into positive (+) anti-beta(1)-AR or negative (-) anti-beta(1)-AR groups according to their anti-beta(1)-AR reactivity. Echocardiography (ECG) was performed at baseline and after one year of metoprolol therapy in combination with standard treatment regime for CHF, that is, digoxin, diuretics and an ACEI (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor). The dose of metoprolol was doubled on a biweekly basis up to 50 mg x 2 daily (b.i.d./day) or attainment of maximum tolerated dose. Ninety-six patients completed final data analysis. Fifty-four patients with (+) anti-beta(1)-AR had greater improvements than 42 patients with (-) anti-beta(1)-AR in LVEDD (left ventricular end-diastolic dimension) (P < 0.01, from 69 +/- 0.8 to 58.0 +/- 0.5 mm vs. 69.0 +/- 0.8-63.6 +/- 0.9 mm) and LVESD (left ventricular end-systolic dimension) (P < 0.01, from 57.1 +/- 1.4 to 43.9 +/- 0.8 mm vs. 56.2 +/- 0.9-48.6 +/- 1.0 mm), and LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction) (P < 0.01, from 35.4 +/- 1.3 to 49.8 +/- 0.6% vs. 34.4 +/- 1.0-44.3 +/- 1.1%) by metoprolol therapy in combination with standard treatment regime for one year. Of the CHF patients with (+) anti-beta(1)-AR, 65.4% responded to target metoprolol dose as compared to 21.4% of CHF patients without anti-beta(1)-AR (P < 0.01). Response to target metoprolol dose occurred more rapidly in (+) anti-beta(1)-AR than (-) anti-beta(1)-AR of CHF patients (67.5 +/- 2.4 vs. 100.8 +/- 3.0 days, P < 0.01). These results demonstrated that CHF patients with (+) anti-beta(1)-AR had greater improvements in LV remodelling and heart function by metoprolol as compared to (-) anti-beta(1)-AR patients. Moreover, patients with (+) anti-beta(1)-AR have better tolerance to metoprolol therapy than patients without anti-beta(1)-AR.
针对β1 - 肾上腺素能受体(β1 - AR)的自身抗体已被认为与充血性心力衰竭(CHF)的病理过程有关。我们假设,抗β1 - AR自身抗体的存在与美托洛尔治疗后左心室(LV)重构有关。合成的β1 - AR肽作为酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)中的靶抗原,用于筛查106例CHF患者的血清。根据患者抗β1 - AR反应性,将患者分为抗β1 - AR阳性(+)或阴性( - )组。在基线时以及美托洛尔治疗一年后,结合CHF的标准治疗方案(即地高辛、利尿剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI))进行超声心动图(ECG)检查。美托洛尔剂量每两周加倍,直至达到每日50 mg×2次(每日两次/b.i.d.)或最大耐受剂量。96例患者完成了最终数据分析。54例抗β1 - AR阳性(+)患者在左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)(P < 0.01,从69±0.8至58.0±0.5 mm,而69.0±0.8 - 63.6±0.9 mm)、左心室收缩末期内径(LVESD)(P < 0.01,从57.1±1.4至43.9±0.8 mm,而56.2±0.9 - 48.6±1.0 mm)和左心室射血分数(LVEF)(P < 0.01,从35.4±1.3至49.8±0.6%,而34.4±1.0 - 44.3±1.1%)方面,比42例抗β1 - AR阴性( - )患者通过美托洛尔联合标准治疗方案治疗一年后有更大改善。在抗β1 - AR阳性(+)的CHF患者中,65.4%达到了美托洛尔目标剂量,而无抗β1 - AR的CHF患者为21.4%(P < 0.01)。抗β1 - AR阳性(+)的CHF患者比抗β1 - AR阴性( - )的患者达到美托洛尔目标剂量的速度更快(67.5±2.4天对100.8±3.0天,P < 0.01)。这些结果表明,与抗β1 - AR阴性( - )患者相比,抗β1 - AR阳性(+)的CHF患者通过美托洛尔治疗在左心室重构和心脏功能方面有更大改善。此外,抗β1 - AR阳性(+)的患者比无抗β1 - AR的患者对美托洛尔治疗的耐受性更好。