Sasson Lior, Katz Michael G, Ezri Tiberiu, Tamir Akiva, Herman Amir, Bove Edward L, Schachner Arie
Angela & Sami Shamoon Cardiothoracic Department, The Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Sep;82(3):958-63; discussion 963. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.094.
Different techniques have been described for tricuspid valve detachment to improve visualization in ventricular septal defect repair. Our hypothesis was that preoperative echocardiographic criteria are important in deciding which patients should undergo ventricular septal defect repair by tricuspid valve detachment, and patients who undergo this procedure may have a better surgical outcome than those who fulfilled the criteria but were actually operated on with the standard surgical approach.
Between January 2000 and December 2004 we prospectively studied 179 patients scheduled for ventricular septal defect repair and criteria for tricuspid valve detachment were established. Of these, 84 patients did not have any criteria for tricuspid valve detachment and were classified as the control group (group 1). Ninety-five patients with at least one criterion for tricuspid valve detachment were intraoperatively divided by patients who underwent tricuspid valve detachment into group 2 (n = 41), and those who did not undergo tricuspid valve detachment into group 3 (n = 53).
Surgical complications occurred more frequently in group 3 (26%) as opposed to group 2 (10%) and group 1 (7%). Residual ventricular septal defect and atrioventricular block occurred only in group 3. Tricuspid regurgitation occurred in 15% of group 3 versus 9.8% of group 2 and 7.1% of group 1.
Preoperative criteria for tricuspid valve detachment can be established before repair of ventricular septal defect. Patients who had indications for tricuspid valve detachment who actually had detachment performed during repair had fewer postoperative surgical complications as opposed to patients who fulfilled the criteria but did not undergo detachment.
为了在室间隔缺损修补术中改善视野,已经描述了不同的三尖瓣分离技术。我们的假设是,术前超声心动图标准对于决定哪些患者应通过三尖瓣分离进行室间隔缺损修补很重要,并且接受该手术的患者可能比那些符合标准但实际采用标准手术方法进行手术的患者有更好的手术结果。
在2000年1月至2004年12月期间,我们前瞻性地研究了179例计划进行室间隔缺损修补的患者,并建立了三尖瓣分离标准。其中,84例患者没有任何三尖瓣分离标准,被归类为对照组(第1组)。95例至少有一项三尖瓣分离标准的患者在术中根据是否接受三尖瓣分离分为第2组(n = 41)和第3组(n = 53),第2组接受了三尖瓣分离,第3组未接受三尖瓣分离。
与第2组(10%)和第1组(7%)相比,第3组手术并发症的发生率更高(26%)。残余室间隔缺损和房室传导阻滞仅发生在第3组。第3组三尖瓣反流发生率为15%,而第2组为9.8%,第1组为7.1%。
在室间隔缺损修补术前可以建立三尖瓣分离的术前标准。与符合标准但未进行分离的患者相比,有三尖瓣分离指征且在修补术中实际进行了分离的患者术后手术并发症更少。