Racine Normand, Rouleau Jean-Lucien
Department of Medicine, Universit of Montreal and Research Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec.
Can J Cardiol. 2006 Aug;22 Suppl C(Suppl C):8C-12C. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70996-5.
The treatment of patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction has improved markedly over the past two decades. Nevertheless, the morbidity and mortality rates remain high in this population. In addition to pharmacological therapies to attenuate neurohumoral overactivation, the present challenge is to find additional therapeutic avenues. Percutaneous coronary intervention, although widely used in patients with coronary artery disease, is more challenging with multivessel disease and associated left ventricular dysfunction, and its optimal use in heart failure remains in question. Cardiac surgical revascularization and surgical ventricular restoration have also been advocated. To date, there are no prospective, randomized clinical studies to prove a benefit from these invasive interventions and to identify which patients may derive the most benefit compared with optimal medical therapy alone. The current management of patients with ischemic heart failure needs to be challenged and requires an objective evaluation of these invasive interventions. The ongoing Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial is the first randomized trial designed to determine the long-term benefits of surgical revascularization and surgical ventricular restoration compared with optimal medical therapy alone. The results of this study will provide additional evidence-based information to guide physicians in the rational allocation of health care resources. The role of percutaneous angioplasty in patients with ischemic heart failure also needs to be addressed objectively.
在过去二十年中,冠心病合并左心室功能障碍患者的治疗有了显著改善。然而,这一人群的发病率和死亡率仍然很高。除了采用药物疗法减轻神经体液过度激活外,目前面临的挑战是寻找其他治疗途径。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗虽然在冠心病患者中广泛应用,但对于多支血管病变及相关左心室功能障碍患者而言更具挑战性,其在心力衰竭中的最佳应用仍存在疑问。心脏外科血运重建和外科心室修复也已得到提倡。迄今为止,尚无前瞻性、随机临床研究证明这些有创干预措施的益处,也无法确定与单纯最佳药物治疗相比,哪些患者可能获益最大。缺血性心力衰竭患者的当前治疗方法需要受到质疑,并且需要对这些有创干预措施进行客观评估。正在进行的缺血性心力衰竭外科治疗(STICH)试验是首个旨在确定与单纯最佳药物治疗相比,外科血运重建和外科心室修复的长期益处的随机试验。这项研究的结果将提供更多基于证据的信息,以指导医生合理分配医疗资源。经皮血管成形术在缺血性心力衰竭患者中的作用也需要客观探讨。