Suppr超能文献

强化生物除磷洗出的机制与温度的关系。

The mechanism of enhanced biological phosphorus removal washout and temperature relationships.

作者信息

Erdal Ufuk G, Erdal Zeynep K, Randall Clifford W

机构信息

CH2M HILL, Santa Ana, CA 92707, USA.

出版信息

Water Environ Res. 2006 Jul;78(7):710-5. doi: 10.2175/106143006x101737.

Abstract

In this study, the combined effects of temperature and solids retention time (SRT) on enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) performance and the mechanism of EBPR washout were investigated. Two pilot-scale University of Cape Town (South Africa) systems fed with synthetic wastewater were operated at 5 and 10 degrees C. The results showed that the phosphorus removal performance was optimum at total SRT ranges of 16 to 24 days and 12 to 17 days for 5 and 10 degrees C, respectively, and steady-state phosphorus removal was greater at the lower temperature. Higher SRT values of up to 32 days at 5 degrees C and 25 days at 10 degrees C slightly reduced EBPR performance as a result of increased extent of endogenous respiration, which consumed internally stored glycogen, leaving less reducing power for poly-hydroxy alkanoate (PHA) formation in anaerobic stages. The phosphorus-accumulating organism (PAO) washout SRTs of the systems were determined as 3.5 days at 5 degrees C and 1.8 days at 10 degrees C, considerably less than the washout SRTs of nitrifiers. Polyphosphorus, the main energy reserve of the EBPR bacterial consortium, was not completely depleted, even at washout points. The inability of EBPR biomass to use glycogen to generate reducing power for PHA formation was the major reason for washout. The results not only suggest that glycogen mechanism is the most rate-limiting step in EBPR systems, but also that it is an integral part of EBPR biochemistry, as proposed originally by Mino et al. (1987), and later others (Pereira et al., 1996, Erdal et al., 2002; Erdal, Z. K., 2002). The aerobic washout SRT values (2.1 and 1.2 days for 5 and 10 degrees C, respectively) of this study did not fit the linear line for PAO washout developed by Mamais and Jenkins (1992). Perhaps this was because the feeds used during this study were chemical-oxygen-demand-limited (acetate-based synthetic feed), whereas the feeds used for their study were phosphorus-limited (external acetate added to domestic wastewater), resulting in different ratios of PAOs and nonPAOs in the biomass.

摘要

在本研究中,研究了温度和固体停留时间(SRT)对强化生物除磷(EBPR)性能的综合影响以及EBPR系统失效的机制。两个中试规模的南非开普敦大学系统采用合成废水进水,分别在5℃和10℃下运行。结果表明,对于5℃和10℃,总SRT范围分别为16至24天和12至17天时,除磷性能最佳,且低温下的稳态除磷效果更好。5℃时高达32天以及10℃时高达25天的较高SRT值,由于内源呼吸程度增加,略微降低了EBPR性能,内源呼吸消耗了内部储存的糖原,使得厌氧阶段用于聚羟基烷酸酯(PHA)形成的还原力减少。该系统中聚磷菌(PAO)的洗出SRT在5℃时确定为3.5天,在10℃时为1.8天,远低于硝化菌的洗出SRT。即使在洗出点,作为EBPR细菌群落主要能量储备的聚磷也没有完全耗尽。EBPR生物质无法利用糖原产生用于PHA形成的还原力是洗出的主要原因。结果不仅表明糖原机制是EBPR系统中最具限速作用的步骤,而且正如Mino等人(1987年)以及后来其他人(Pereira等人,1996年;Erdal等人,2002年;Erdal,Z.K.,2002年)最初所提出的那样,它是EBPR生物化学的一个组成部分。本研究中的好氧洗出SRT值(5℃和10℃时分别为2.1天和1.2天)不符合Mamais和Jenkins(1992年)建立的PAO洗出线性关系。这可能是因为本研究中使用的进水是化学需氧量受限的(基于乙酸盐的合成进水),而他们研究中使用的进水是磷受限的(向生活污水中添加外部乙酸盐),导致生物质中PAO和非PAO的比例不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验