Díaz Fredi Alexander, Martínez Ruth Aralí, Villar Luis Angel
Centro de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Biomedica. 2006 Mar;26(1):22-30.
Clinical differentiation of dengue from other diseases with similar symptoms is difficult. The case definition of the World Health Organization (WHO) has high sensitivity but its specificity is very low.
A diagnostic scale was formulated for early clinical diagnosis of dengue that provided greater accuracy than that of the WHO definition.
A cohort of 251 adults (> 12 years of age) with unspecific acute febrile syndrome was selected from clinics located in Bucaramanga, Colombia. They consisted of 125 cases of dengue (serologically and/or virologically confirmed) and 126 with other febrile diseases. Clinical manifestations encountered during the first four days of dengue disease were determined, along with the diverse diagnostic combinations that were presented.
: The scale consisted of the following criteria: presence of rash, positive tourniquet test, absence of nasal discharge, arthralgias, absence of diarrhea (1 point for each finding), leukocyte count < 4,000/mm3 (3 points) and platelet count < 180.000/mm3 (2 points). In a receiver-operating-characteristic curve, the predictive area of 81.0% was significantly superior to the one produced with WHO criteria, (70.0%, p < 0.001). Febrile syndrome with at least a 3 point score obtained the following values: sensitivity = 95.2%; specificity = 27.8%; positive predictive value = 56.7%; negative predicative value = 85.4%. With a 6-point score, sensitivity = 70.4%; specificity = 78.6%; positive predictive value = 76.5%; negative predicative value = 72.8%. With at least 8 points: sensitivity = 42.4%; specificity = 96%; positive predictive value = 91.4%; negative predictive value = 62.7%. With 9 or 10 points, specificity and positive predictive value were of 100%.
The described scale proved useful for early clinical diagnosis of dengue, but requires validation for its application in endemic areas.
登革热与其他症状相似疾病的临床鉴别存在困难。世界卫生组织(WHO)的病例定义敏感性高但其特异性很低。
制定一种用于登革热早期临床诊断的诊断量表,其准确性高于WHO的定义。
从哥伦比亚布卡拉曼加的诊所选取了251名患有非特异性急性发热综合征的成年人(年龄>12岁)。其中包括125例登革热病例(经血清学和/或病毒学确诊)以及126例患有其他发热性疾病的患者。确定了登革热疾病头四天出现的临床表现以及呈现出的各种诊断组合。
该量表由以下标准组成:皮疹、束臂试验阳性、无流涕、关节痛、无腹泻(每项发现计1分)、白细胞计数<4000/mm³(计3分)以及血小板计数<180000/mm³(计2分)。在受试者工作特征曲线中,81.0%的预测面积显著优于采用WHO标准得出的结果(70.0%,p<0.001)。发热综合征至少得3分的情况得出以下数值:敏感性=95.2%;特异性=27.8%;阳性预测值=56.7%;阴性预测值=85.4%。得6分的情况:敏感性=70.4%;特异性=78.6%;阳性预测值=76.5%;阴性预测值=72.8%。至少得8分的情况:敏感性=42.4%;特异性=96%;阳性预测值=91.4%;阴性预测值=62.7%。得9分或10分的情况,特异性和阳性预测值均为100%。
所述量表经证明对登革热的早期临床诊断有用,但在流行地区应用还需验证。