• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症的流行病学——澳大拉西亚地区有何不同?

The epidemiology of sepsis--is Australasia different?

作者信息

French Craig J

机构信息

Division of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Crit Care Resusc. 2006 Sep;8(3):219-22.

PMID:16930108
Abstract

Sepsis is a common reason for intensive care unit admission and a leading cause of mortality. Recent prospective randomised controlled trials have shown improved outcomes for patients with severe sepsis. Implementation of these findings into clinical practice has varied. Reasons appear complex but may include regional differences in the epidemiology of sepsis. To improve clinicians' understanding of sepsis, multiple epidemiological studies have been performed in the past 15 years. Differences in study populations and methodology make comparison difficult. After allowing for these differences, it is likely that the percentage of patients with severe sepsis in ICUs is less in Australasia than in many other developed nations. However, the population incidence, mortality, site and causative agent of infection are probably similar. This suggests that treatments and strategies whose efficacy has been demonstrated in other jurisdictions will also be effective in Australasia.

摘要

脓毒症是重症监护病房收治患者的常见原因,也是主要的死亡原因。近期的前瞻性随机对照试验表明,严重脓毒症患者的治疗效果有所改善。这些研究结果在临床实践中的应用情况各不相同。原因似乎很复杂,但可能包括脓毒症流行病学的地区差异。为提高临床医生对脓毒症的认识,在过去15年里进行了多项流行病学研究。研究人群和方法的差异使得比较变得困难。考虑到这些差异后,澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护病房中严重脓毒症患者的比例可能低于许多其他发达国家。然而,感染的人群发病率、死亡率、部位和病原体可能相似。这表明,在其他地区已证明有效的治疗方法和策略在澳大利亚和新西兰也将有效。

相似文献

1
The epidemiology of sepsis--is Australasia different?脓毒症的流行病学——澳大拉西亚地区有何不同?
Crit Care Resusc. 2006 Sep;8(3):219-22.
2
The outcome of patients with sepsis and septic shock presenting to emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand.在澳大利亚和新西兰的急诊科就诊的脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的治疗结果。
Crit Care Resusc. 2007 Mar;9(1):8-18.
3
[Peritonitis: main reason of severe sepsis in surgical intensive care].[腹膜炎:外科重症监护中严重脓毒症的主要原因]
Zentralbl Chir. 2007 Apr;132(2):130-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-960478.
4
Sepsis incidence and outcome: contrasting the intensive care unit with the hospital ward.脓毒症的发病率及转归:重症监护病房与普通病房的对比
Crit Care Med. 2007 May;35(5):1284-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000260960.94300.DE.
5
Epidemiology of severe sepsis in critically ill surgical patients in ten university hospitals in China.中国十所大学医院重症外科患者严重脓毒症的流行病学研究。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Nov;35(11):2538-46. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000284492.30800.00.
6
The epidemiology of severe sepsis in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 1996 to 2004: secondary analysis of a high quality clinical database, the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database.1996年至2004年英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰严重脓毒症的流行病学:对高质量临床数据库ICNARC病例组合项目数据库的二次分析。
Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R42. doi: 10.1186/cc4854.
7
Adult-population incidence of severe sepsis in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units.澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护病房中成人严重脓毒症的发病率。
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Apr;30(4):589-96. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2157-0. Epub 2004 Feb 12.
8
Observational study of patients admitted to intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand after interhospital transfer.对澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护病房收治的院际转运患者的观察性研究。
Crit Care Resusc. 2008 Jun;10(2):90-6.
9
Why is there such a difference in outcome between Australian intensive care units and others?为什么澳大利亚重症监护病房与其他国家的重症监护病房在治疗结果上存在如此大的差异?
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007 Apr;20(2):100-5. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32802c7cd5.
10
The influence of volume and intensive care unit organization on hospital mortality in patients admitted with severe sepsis: a retrospective multicentre cohort study.容量及重症监护病房组织形式对严重脓毒症住院患者医院死亡率的影响:一项回顾性多中心队列研究
Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R40. doi: 10.1186/cc5727.

引用本文的文献

1
Pro/Con debate: is procalcitonin useful for guiding antibiotic decision making in critically ill patients?正反方辩论:降钙素原对指导重症患者抗生素决策是否有用?
Crit Care. 2008;12(3):211. doi: 10.1186/cc6860. Epub 2008 May 2.