Suppr超能文献

定向遗忘中的自动提取。

Automatic retrieval in directed forgetting.

作者信息

Vonk Jennifer, Horton Keith D

机构信息

Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2006 Apr;34(3):505-17. doi: 10.3758/bf03193574.

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated the role of automatic retrieval in directed forgetting, using a stem completion test. In each experiment, we compared the performance of an implicit group, a process dissociation procedure (PDP) group, and a group given a speeded response task. The response times of the speeded response group on the stem completion task replicated earlier data in suggesting that this group adopted a purely automatic retrieval strategy. Experiment 1 revealed a directed-forgetting effect on automatic retrieval with the item method, but Experiment 2 revealed no directed-forgetting effect on automatic retrieval with the list method, consistent with the lack of implicit effects with the list method throughout the literature. Both experiments showed lower automatic estimates for the PDP group than for the implicit and speeded response groups, which did not differ. The data are consistent with either a selective rehearsal or an inhibition account of directed forgetting with the list method. The comparison of methods for assessing automatic retrieval is consistent with earlier evidence suggesting that subjects may adopt a generate/recognize strategy when given direct retrieval instructions.

摘要

在两项实验中,我们使用词干补全测试研究了自动提取在定向遗忘中的作用。在每个实验中,我们比较了一个内隐组、一个过程分离程序(PDP)组和一个接受快速反应任务组的表现。快速反应组在词干补全任务上的反应时间重复了早期数据,表明该组采用了纯粹的自动提取策略。实验1用项目法揭示了对自动提取的定向遗忘效应,但实验2用列表法未揭示对自动提取的定向遗忘效应,这与整个文献中列表法缺乏内隐效应一致。两项实验均显示,PDP组的自动估计值低于内隐组和快速反应组,而后两组之间没有差异。这些数据与列表法定向遗忘的选择性复述或抑制解释均相符。评估自动提取方法的比较与早期证据一致,表明当给予直接提取指令时,受试者可能会采用生成/识别策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验