Suppr超能文献

反对普遍接种水痘疫苗的理由。

The case against universal varicella vaccination.

作者信息

Goldman Gary S

机构信息

Medical Veritas International Inc., Pearblossom, California 93553, USA.

出版信息

Int J Toxicol. 2006 Sep-Oct;25(5):313-7. doi: 10.1080/10915810600870591.

Abstract

In 1995, the United States became the first country to implement a Universal Varicella Vaccination Program. Several questions remain: Is the varicella (chickenpox) vaccine needed? Is it cost effective as a routine immunization for all susceptible children? Or is it more beneficial for the disease to remain endemic so that adults may receive periodic exogenous exposures (boosts) that help suppress the reactivation of herpes zoster (shingles). In addition, as vaccination coverage becomes widespread, does loss of immunologic boosting cause a decline in vaccine efficacy and result in a reduced period of immunity? Scientific literature regarding safety of the varicella vaccine and its associated cost-benefit analysis have often reported optimistic evaluations based on ideal assumptions. Deleterious outcomes and their associated costs must be included when making a circumspect assessment of the Universal Varicella Vaccination Program.

摘要

1995年,美国成为首个实施普遍水痘疫苗接种计划的国家。仍存在几个问题:水痘(带状疱疹)疫苗是否必要?作为所有易感儿童的常规免疫接种,其成本效益如何?或者让该疾病保持地方性流行是否更有益,以便成年人可以接受定期的外源性接触(增强免疫),这有助于抑制带状疱疹(缠腰龙)的复发。此外,随着疫苗接种覆盖率的广泛提高,免疫增强作用的丧失是否会导致疫苗效力下降并缩短免疫期?关于水痘疫苗安全性及其相关成本效益分析的科学文献,常常基于理想假设给出乐观评估。在对普遍水痘疫苗接种计划进行审慎评估时,必须纳入有害后果及其相关成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验