Micek Scott T, Roubinian Nareg, Heuring Tim, Bode Meghan, Williams Jennifer, Harrison Courtney, Murphy Theresa, Prentice Donna, Ruoff Brent E, Kollef Marin H
Department of Pharmacy, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St Louis, MO, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;34(11):2707-13. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000241151.25426.D7.
To evaluate a standardized hospital order set for the management of septic shock in the emergency department.
Before-after study design with prospective consecutive data collection.
Emergency department of a 1,200-bed academic medical center.
A total of 120 patients with septic shock.
Implementation of a standardized hospital order set for the management of septic shock.
A total of 120 consecutive patients with septic shock were identified. Sixty patients (50.0%) were managed before the implementation of the standardized order set, constituting the before group, and 60 (50.0%) were evaluated after the implementation of the standardized order set, making up the after group. Demographic variables and severity of illness measured by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II were similar for both groups. Patients in the after group received statistically more intravenous fluids while in the emergency department (2825 +/- 1624 mL vs. 3789 +/- 1730 mL, p = .002), were more likely to receive intravenous fluids of >20 mL/kg body weight before vasopressor administration (58.3% vs. 88.3%, p < .001), and were more likely to be treated with an appropriate initial antimicrobial regimen (71.7% vs. 86.7%, p = .043) compared with patients in the before group. Patients in the after group were less likely to require vasopressor administration at the time of transfer to the intensive care unit (100.0% vs. 71.7%, p < .001), had a shorter hospital length of stay (12.1 +/- 9.2 days vs. 8.9 +/- 7.2 days, p = .038), and a lower risk for 28-day mortality (48.3% vs. 30.0%, p = .040).
Our study found that the implementation of a standardized order set for the management of septic shock in the emergency department was associated with statistically more rigorous fluid resuscitation of patients, greater administration of appropriate initial antibiotic treatment, and a lower 28-day mortality. These data suggest that the use of standardized order sets for the management of septic shock should be routinely employed.
评估用于急诊科感染性休克管理的标准化医院医嘱集。
采用前瞻性连续数据收集的前后对照研究设计。
一家拥有1200张床位的学术医疗中心的急诊科。
总共120例感染性休克患者。
实施用于感染性休克管理的标准化医院医嘱集。
共识别出120例连续的感染性休克患者。60例患者(50.0%)在标准化医嘱集实施前接受治疗,构成前组;60例(50.0%)在标准化医嘱集实施后接受评估,构成后组。两组患者的人口统计学变量以及通过急性生理学与慢性健康状况评价II(APACHE II)评估的疾病严重程度相似。后组患者在急诊科接受的静脉补液量在统计学上更多(2825±1624毫升 vs. 3789±1730毫升,p = 0.002),在使用血管活性药物之前接受>20毫升/千克体重静脉补液的可能性更高(58.3% vs. 88.3%,p < 0.001),并且与前组患者相比,更有可能接受适当的初始抗菌治疗方案(71.7% vs. 86.7%,p = 0.043)。后组患者在转至重症监护病房时需要使用血管活性药物的可能性更低(100.0% vs. 71.7%,p < 0.001),住院时间更短(12.1±9.2天 vs. 8.9±7.2天,p = 0.038),28天死亡率风险更低(48.3% vs. 30.0%,p = 0.040)。
我们的研究发现,在急诊科实施用于感染性休克管理的标准化医嘱集与患者在统计学上更严格的液体复苏、更广泛地给予适当的初始抗生素治疗以及更低的28天死亡率相关。这些数据表明,应常规使用标准化医嘱集来管理感染性休克。