Veasey Sigrid C, Guilleminault Christian, Strohl Kingman P, Sanders Mark H, Ballard Robert D, Magalang Ulysses J
Center for Sleep Respiratory Neurobiology, University of Pennsylvania, 972 Maloney Building, 3600 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Sleep. 2006 Aug;29(8):1036-44. doi: 10.1093/sleep/29.8.1036.
A significant number of patients with obstructive sleep apnea neither tolerate positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy nor achieve successful outcomes from either upper airway surgeries or use of an oral appliance. The purpose of this paper, therefore, was to systematically evaluate available peer-reviewed data on the effectiveness of adjunctive medical therapies and summarize findings from these studies. A review from 1985 to 2005 of the English literature reveals several practical findings. Weight loss has additional health benefits and should be routinely recommended to most overweight patients. Presently, there are no widely effective pharmacotherapies for individuals with sleep apnea, with the important exceptions of individuals with hypothyroidism or with acromegaly. Treating the underlying medical condition can have pronounced effects on the apnea/hypopnea index. Stimulant therapy leads to a small but statistically significant improvement in objective sleepiness. Nonetheless, residual sleepiness remains a significant health concern. Supplemental oxygen and positional therapy may benefit subsets of patients, but whether these therapies reduce morbidities as PAP therapy does will require rigorous randomized trials. PAP therapy has set the bar high for successful treatment of sleep apnea and its associated morbidities. Nonetheless, we should strive towards the development of universally effective pharmacotherapies for sleep apnea. To accomplish this, we require a greater knowledge of the neurochemical mechanisms underlying sleep apnea, and we must use this infrastructure of knowledge to design well-controlled, adequately powered studies that examine, not only effects on the apnea/hypopnea index, but also the effects of pharmacotherapies on all health related outcomes shown beneficial with PAP therapy.
相当一部分阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者既无法耐受气道正压通气(PAP)治疗,也无法通过上气道手术或使用口腔矫治器取得成功的治疗效果。因此,本文的目的是系统评估关于辅助药物治疗有效性的同行评审数据,并总结这些研究的结果。对1985年至2005年英文文献的综述揭示了几个实际的研究发现。减肥对健康有额外益处,应常规推荐给大多数超重患者。目前,除了甲状腺功能减退症患者或肢端肥大症患者外,没有广泛有效的药物疗法可用于治疗睡眠呼吸暂停患者。治疗潜在的内科疾病对呼吸暂停/低通气指数可能有显著影响。兴奋剂治疗可使客观嗜睡程度有小幅但具有统计学意义的改善。尽管如此,残余嗜睡仍然是一个重大的健康问题。补充氧气和体位治疗可能对部分患者有益,但这些疗法是否能像PAP治疗那样降低发病率,还需要进行严格的随机试验。PAP治疗为成功治疗睡眠呼吸暂停及其相关疾病设定了很高的标准。尽管如此,我们仍应努力开发普遍有效的睡眠呼吸暂停药物疗法。要实现这一目标,我们需要更深入了解睡眠呼吸暂停背后的神经化学机制,并且必须利用这一知识体系来设计控制良好、样本量充足的研究,这些研究不仅要考察对呼吸暂停/低通气指数的影响,还要考察药物疗法对所有与健康相关的结局的影响,而这些结局在PAP治疗中已显示出有益效果。