Gray John S, Dayton Paul, Thrush Simon, Kaiser Michel J
Marine Biodiversity Research Program, Department of Biology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2006 Aug;52(8):840-3. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.07.003.
The evidence for the wider effects of fishing on the marine ecosystem demands that we incorporate these considerations into our management of human activities. The consequences of the direct physical disturbance of the seabed caused by towed bottom-fishing gear have been studied extensively with over 100 manipulations reported in the peer-reviewed literature. The outcome of these studies varies according to the gear used and the habitat in which it was deployed. This variability in the response of different benthic systems concurs with established theoretical models of the response of community metrics to disturbance. Despite this powerful evidence, a recent FAO report wrongly concludes that the variability in the reported responses to fishing disturbance mean that no firm conclusion as to the effects of fishing disturbance can be made. This thesis is further supported (incorrectly) by the supposition that current benthic sampling methodologies are inadequate to demonstrate the effects of fishing disturbance on benthic systems. The present article addresses these two erroneous conclusions which may confuse non-experts and in particular policy-makers.
捕鱼对海洋生态系统产生更广泛影响的证据要求我们将这些考虑因素纳入人类活动的管理之中。拖网式底栖捕鱼渔具对海床造成直接物理干扰的后果已得到广泛研究,同行评审文献中报告了100多次相关操作。这些研究的结果因所使用的渔具及其部署的栖息地而异。不同底栖系统反应的这种变异性与群落指标对干扰反应的既定理论模型一致。尽管有这一有力证据,但粮农组织最近的一份报告错误地得出结论,称报告的对捕鱼干扰反应的变异性意味着无法就捕鱼干扰的影响得出确凿结论。当前底栖采样方法不足以证明捕鱼干扰对底栖系统的影响这一假设(错误地)进一步支持了这一论点。本文探讨了这两个可能会使非专家尤其是政策制定者感到困惑的错误结论。