Suppr超能文献

临时内撑开技术辅助矫正重度脊柱侧弯。

Temporary internal distraction as an aid to correction of severe scoliosis.

作者信息

Buchowski Jacob M, Bhatnagar Rishi, Skaggs David L, Sponseller Paul D

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Sep;88(9):2035-41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00823.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Halo traction is a well-recognized adjunct for correcting severe complex rigid scoliotic curves, but it is associated with complications and is contraindicated in the presence of fixed cervical instability, kyphosis, or stenosis. In addition, halo traction often requires prolonged hospital stays and is not welcomed by all families. These limitations led to consideration of temporary internal distraction as an alternative.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of children in whom severe scoliosis had been treated with temporary internal distraction. Our goals were to (1) assess whether the use of temporary internal distraction can aid in the correction of severe scoliosis and (2) identify complications associated with temporary internal distraction and compare them with those associated with halo traction. The mean preoperative curve was 104 degrees . All patients underwent initial posterior release of the rigid portion of the spine (with six also having anterior release) and placement of spinal instrumentation under distraction during spinal cord monitoring. Of the ten patients, four had one distraction procedure (i.e., the initial surgery [or first distraction] followed by definitive fusion and the remaining six had two distraction procedures (i.e., the initial surgery [or first distraction] followed by the second distraction) followed by definitive fusion. After distraction, all patients underwent posterior spinal fusion with definitive dual-rod fixation. The amount of correction was determined by measuring the curve on plain radiographs made preoperatively, after each internal distraction procedure, after definitive fusion, and at the time of final follow-up.

RESULTS

Curve correction after use of internal distraction, and before definitive fusion, averaged 53% (from 104 degrees to 49 degrees ) (range, 39% [from 70 degrees to 43 degrees ] to 79% [from 70 degrees to 15 degrees ]). This method facilitated safe, gradual deformity correction in all ten patients. The mean time between the initial procedure and the definitive fusion was 2.4 weeks. The mean final curve correction was 80% (from 104 degrees to 20 degrees ) (range, 73% [from 131 degrees to 35 degrees ] to 91% [from 110 degrees to 10 degrees ]). No neurologic deficits or infections resulted.

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary internal distraction is a viable alternative approach to maximizing curve correction in patients undergoing spinal fusion for severe scoliosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.

摘要

背景

头环牵引是一种公认的用于矫正严重复杂僵硬脊柱侧弯曲线的辅助方法,但它会引发并发症,在存在固定性颈椎不稳、后凸畸形或椎管狭窄的情况下为禁忌。此外,头环牵引通常需要延长住院时间,并非所有家庭都愿意接受。这些局限性促使人们考虑将临时内撑开作为一种替代方法。

方法

我们回顾性分析了接受临时内撑开治疗严重脊柱侧弯的儿童的病历。我们的目标是:(1)评估临时内撑开的使用是否有助于矫正严重脊柱侧弯;(2)确定与临时内撑开相关的并发症,并将其与头环牵引相关的并发症进行比较。术前平均侧弯角度为104度。所有患者均首先对脊柱的僵硬部分进行后路松解(其中6例还进行了前路松解),并在脊髓监测下于撑开状态下置入脊柱内固定器械。10例患者中,4例接受了一次撑开手术(即初次手术[或首次撑开],随后进行确定性融合),其余6例接受了两次撑开手术(即初次手术[或首次撑开],随后进行第二次撑开),随后进行确定性融合。撑开后,所有患者均接受了后路脊柱融合及确定性双棒固定。通过测量术前、每次内撑开手术后、确定性融合后以及最终随访时拍摄的X线平片上的侧弯角度来确定矫正量。

结果

使用内撑开并在确定性融合前,侧弯矫正平均为53%(从104度降至49度)(范围为39%[从70度降至43度]至79%[从70度降至15度])。该方法使所有10例患者均实现了安全、渐进的畸形矫正。初次手术与确定性融合之间平均间隔时间为2.4周。最终平均侧弯矫正为80%(从104度降至20度)(范围为73%[从131度降至35度]至91%[从110度降至10度])。未出现神经功能缺损或感染情况。

结论

对于接受脊柱融合治疗严重脊柱侧弯的患者,临时内撑开是一种可行的替代方法,可实现最大程度的侧弯矫正。

证据级别

治疗性四级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验