Suppr超能文献

气道压力释放通气在急性肺损伤管理中的作用是什么?

What is the role of airway pressure release ventilation in the management of acute lung injury?

作者信息

Petsinger Douglas E, Fernandez Jan D, Davies John D

机构信息

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Egleston Campus, Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, 1405 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care Clin N Am. 2006 Sep;12(3):483-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rcc.2006.06.004.

Abstract

The lack of published evidence supporting the use of APRV in the pediatric critical care patient population may diminish its effective application in respiratory failure. The effect of APRV on the number of ventilator days, ICU stay, and mortality still remains to be studied. Further application of APRV in the role of rest settings for ECMO especially in the pediatric cardiac patient population needs to be investigated. Will the use of APRV decrease the time for adequate lung recruitment, decrease sheer trauma, and/or promote earlier decannulation upon the restoration of tolerable cardiac function? Can APRV be utilized as a re-recruitment maneuver? A comparison of APRV over sustained in a randomized-controlled fashion, will there be a significant difference in ventilator days, length of ICU stay, and/or mortality? Does re-recruitment at plateau pressures during suctioning, patient position changes, or in the face of increased airway resistance decrease the number of ventilator days, length of ICU stay, and/or mortality? Does the use of continuous monitoring of carbon dioxide production aid in optimizing P(high)? The list of questions, both speculative and scientific are too numerous to list. Speculation leads to inquiry which over time drives science. More focus is needed on randomized, controlled trials. Initially the comparison of APRV to HFOV needs to be the primary focus for a proactive approach for ALI. Once a comfort level is established with this modality, further scientific inquires will follow. In the meantime, its use is likely to remain controversial.

摘要

缺乏已发表的证据支持在儿科重症监护患者群体中使用气道压力释放通气(APRV),这可能会减少其在呼吸衰竭中的有效应用。APRV对机械通气天数、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和死亡率的影响仍有待研究。APRV在体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)休息设置中的进一步应用,尤其是在儿科心脏病患者群体中的应用,需要进行调查。使用APRV是否会减少充分肺复张的时间、减少剪切力创伤和/或在恢复可耐受的心功能后促进更早的拔管?APRV能否用作再次复张策略?以随机对照方式比较APRV和持续气道正压通气,在机械通气天数、ICU住院时间和/或死亡率方面是否会有显著差异?在吸痰、患者体位改变或气道阻力增加时,在平台压下进行再次复张是否会减少机械通气天数、ICU住院时间和/或死亡率?使用连续监测二氧化碳产生是否有助于优化高气道压力(P(high))?无论是推测性的还是科学性的问题清单都太多了,无法一一列举。推测引发探究,随着时间的推移推动科学发展。需要更多地关注随机对照试验。最初,将APRV与高频振荡通气(HFOV)进行比较需要成为急性肺损伤(ALI)积极治疗方法的主要重点。一旦对这种模式建立了舒适度,将随之进行进一步的科学探究。与此同时,它的使用可能仍会存在争议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验