Rejman Joanna, Conese Massimo, Hoekstra Dick
Institute for Experimental Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milano, Italy.
J Liposome Res. 2006;16(3):237-47. doi: 10.1080/08982100600848819.
In this paper we address the contribution of different endocytic pathways to the intracellular uptake and processing of differently sized latex particles and of plasmid DNA complexes by means of fluorescence microscopy and FACS analysis. By using a number of specific inhibitors of either clathrin-dependent or caveolae-dependent endocytosis we were able to discriminate between these two pathways. Latex particles smaller than 200 nm were internalized exclusively by clathrin-mediated endocytosis, whereas larger particles entered the cells via a caveolae-dependent pathway.The route of uptake of plasmid DNA complexes appears strongly dependent on the nature of the complexes. Thus, lipoplexes containing the cationic lipid DOTAP, were exclusively internalized by a clathrin-dependent mechanism, while polyplexes prepared from the cationic polymer polyethyleneimine (PEI) were internalized in roughly equal proportions by both pathways. Upon incubation of cells with lipoplexes containing the luciferase gene abundant luciferase expression was observed, which was effectively blocked by inhibitors of clathrin-dependent endocytosis but not by inhibitors of the caveolae-dependent uptake mechanism. By contrast, luciferase transfection of the cells with polyplexes was unaffected by inhibition of clathrin-mediated endocytosis, but was nearly completely blocked by inhibitors interfering with the caveolae pathway. The results are discussed with respect to possible differences in the mechanism by which plasmid DNA is released from lipoplexes and polyplexes into the cytosol and to the role of size in the uptake and processing of the complexes. Our data suggest that improvement of non-viral gene transfection could very much benefit from controlling particle size, which would allow targeting of particle internalization via a non-degradative pathway, involving caveolae-mediated endocytosis.
在本文中,我们通过荧光显微镜和流式细胞术分析,探讨了不同内吞途径对不同大小乳胶颗粒以及质粒DNA复合物的细胞内摄取和处理的贡献。通过使用多种网格蛋白依赖性或小窝蛋白依赖性内吞作用的特异性抑制剂,我们能够区分这两种途径。小于200 nm的乳胶颗粒仅通过网格蛋白介导的内吞作用内化,而较大的颗粒则通过小窝蛋白依赖性途径进入细胞。质粒DNA复合物的摄取途径似乎强烈依赖于复合物的性质。因此,含有阳离子脂质DOTAP的脂质体复合物仅通过网格蛋白依赖性机制内化,而由阳离子聚合物聚乙烯亚胺(PEI)制备的多聚体复合物则通过两种途径以大致相等的比例内化。在用含有荧光素酶基因的脂质体复合物孵育细胞后,观察到大量的荧光素酶表达,这被网格蛋白依赖性内吞作用的抑制剂有效阻断,但未被小窝蛋白依赖性摄取机制的抑制剂阻断。相比之下,用多聚体复合物对细胞进行荧光素酶转染不受网格蛋白介导的内吞作用抑制的影响,但几乎完全被干扰小窝蛋白途径 的抑制剂阻断。结合质粒DNA从脂质体和多聚体复合物释放到细胞质中的可能机制差异以及大小在复合物摄取和处理中的作用,对结果进行了讨论。我们的数据表明,控制颗粒大小可能非常有助于非病毒基因转染的改进,这将允许通过涉及小窝蛋白介导的内吞作用的非降解途径靶向颗粒内化。