Hornberger John, Robertus Katherine
SPHERE Institute and Acumen LLC, Burlingame, California 94010, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Sep 5;145(5):317-25. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-5-200609050-00004.
The Shingles Prevention Study showed that a varicella-zoster virus (VZV) vaccine administered to adults 60 years of age or older reduced the incidence of herpes zoster from 11.12 to 5.42 cases per 1000 person-years. Median follow-up was 3.1 years, and relative risk reduction was 51.3% (95% CI, 44.2% to 57.6%).
To assess the extent to which clinical and cost variables influence the cost-effectiveness of VZV vaccination for preventing herpes zoster in immunocompetent older adults.
Decision theoretical model.
English-language data published to March 2006 identified from MEDLINE on herpes zoster rates, vaccine effectiveness, quality of life, medical resource use, and unit costs.
Immunocompetent adults 60 years of age or older with a history of VZV infection.
Lifetime.
U.S. societal.
Varicella-zoster virus vaccination versus no vaccination.
Incremental quality-adjusted survival and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.
RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: By reducing incidence and severity of herpes zoster, vaccination can increase quality-adjusted survival by 0.6 day compared with no vaccination. One scenario in which vaccination costs less than 100,000 dollars per QALY gained is when 1) the unit cost of vaccination is less than 200 dollars, 2) the age at vaccination is less than 70 years, and 3) the duration of vaccine efficacy is more than 30 years.
Vaccination would be more cost-effective in "younger" older adults (age 60 to 64 years) than in "older" older adults (age > or =80 years). Longer life expectancy and a higher level of vaccine efficacy offset a lower risk for herpes zoster in the younger group. Other factors influencing cost-effectiveness include quality-of-life adjustments for acute zoster, unit cost of the vaccine, risk for herpes zoster, and duration of vaccine efficacy.
The effectiveness of VZV vaccination remains uncertain beyond the median 3.1-year duration of follow-up in the Shingles Prevention Study.
Varicella-zoster virus vaccination to prevent herpes zoster in older adults would increase QALYs compared with no vaccination. Resolution of uncertainties about the average quality-of-life effects of acute zoster and the duration of vaccine efficacy is needed to better determine the cost-effectiveness of zoster vaccination in older adults.
带状疱疹预防研究表明,给60岁及以上成年人接种水痘 - 带状疱疹病毒(VZV)疫苗可使带状疱疹发病率从每1000人年11.12例降至5.42例。中位随访时间为3.1年,相对危险度降低51.3%(95%CI,44.2%至57.6%)。
评估临床和成本变量对VZV疫苗接种预防免疫功能正常的老年人带状疱疹成本效益的影响程度。
决策理论模型。
2006年3月前发表的英文数据,从MEDLINE中检索关于带状疱疹发病率、疫苗效力、生活质量、医疗资源使用及单位成本的信息。
有VZV感染史的60岁及以上免疫功能正常的成年人。
终身。
美国社会视角。
接种水痘 - 带状疱疹病毒疫苗与不接种疫苗。
增量质量调整生存期及每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本。
通过降低带状疱疹的发病率和严重程度,与不接种疫苗相比,接种疫苗可使质量调整生存期增加0.6天。每获得一个QALY接种疫苗成本低于100,000美元的一种情况是:1)接种疫苗的单位成本低于200美元;2)接种疫苗时的年龄小于70岁;3)疫苗效力持续时间超过30年。
接种疫苗在“较年轻”的老年人(60至64岁)中比在“较年长”的老年人(年龄≥80岁)中更具成本效益。预期寿命延长和疫苗效力水平较高抵消了较年轻组中带状疱疹较低的风险。影响成本效益的其他因素包括急性带状疱疹的生活质量调整、疫苗的单位成本、带状疱疹的风险及疫苗效力持续时间。
在带状疱疹预防研究中位3.1年的随访期之后,VZV疫苗接种的效力仍不确定。
与不接种疫苗相比,给老年人接种水痘 - 带状疱疹病毒疫苗预防带状疱疹可增加QALY。需要解决关于急性带状疱疹平均生活质量影响及疫苗效力持续时间的不确定性,以便更好地确定老年人带状疱疹疫苗接种的成本效益。