Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center at University of Michigan Medical School and University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan (L.A.P.).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (R.H., A.G., I.R.O., F.Z., K.D.).
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Mar 19;170(6):380-388. doi: 10.7326/M18-2347. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
The U.S. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recently developed recommendations for use of a new recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV).
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vaccination with RZV compared with zoster vaccine live (ZVL) and no vaccination, the cost-effectiveness of vaccination with RZV for persons who have previously received ZVL, and the cost-effectiveness of preferential vaccination with RZV over ZVL.
Simulation (state-transition) model using U.S. epidemiologic, clinical, and cost data.
Published data.
Hypothetical cohort of immunocompetent U.S. adults aged 50 years or older.
Lifetime.
Societal and health care sector.
Vaccination with RZV (recommended 2-dose regimen), vaccination with ZVL, and no vaccination.
The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: For vaccination with RZV compared with no vaccination, ICERs ranged by age from $10 000 to $47 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), using a societal perspective and assuming 100% completion of the 2-dose RZV regimen. For persons aged 60 years or older, ICERs were less than $60 000 per QALY. Vaccination with ZVL was dominated by vaccination with RZV for all age groups 60 years or older.
Results were most sensitive to changes in vaccine effectiveness, duration of protection, herpes zoster incidence, and probability of postherpetic neuralgia. Vaccination with RZV after previous administration of ZVL yielded an ICER of less than $60 000 per QALY for persons aged 60 years or older. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, RZV remained the preferred strategy in at least 95% of simulations, including those with 50% completion of the second dose.
Few data were available on risk for serious adverse events, adherence to the recommended 2-dose regimen, and probability of recurrent zoster.
Vaccination with RZV yields cost-effectiveness ratios lower than those for many recommended adult vaccines, including ZVL. Results are robust over a wide range of plausible values.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
美国免疫实施咨询委员会最近制定了使用新的重组带状疱疹疫苗(RZV)的建议。
评估 RZV 疫苗接种与带状疱疹活疫苗(ZVL)和不接种疫苗相比的成本效益,先前接种过 ZVL 的人群接种 RZV 的成本效益,以及 RZV 优先接种相对于 ZVL 的成本效益。
使用美国流行病学、临床和成本数据的模拟(状态转换)模型。
已发表的数据。
假设的免疫功能正常的美国 50 岁或以上的成年人队列。
终生。
社会和医疗保健部门。
接种 RZV(推荐的 2 剂方案)、接种 ZVL 和不接种疫苗。
主要结果衡量标准是增量成本效益比(ICER)。
从社会角度考虑,假设 RZV 两剂方案的完成率为 100%,与不接种疫苗相比,RZV 疫苗接种的 ICER 范围为每质量调整生命年(QALY)10000 至 47000 美元,年龄不同。对于 60 岁及以上的人群,ICER 每 QALY 低于 60000 美元。对于所有 60 岁及以上的年龄组,ZVL 疫苗接种均优于 RZV 疫苗接种。
结果对疫苗效力、保护持续时间、带状疱疹发病率和带状疱疹后神经痛的概率变化最为敏感。对于 60 岁及以上的人群,先前接种 ZVL 后接种 RZV 的 ICER 低于每 QALY 60000 美元。在概率敏感性分析中,在包括第二次剂量完成率为 50%的情况下,RZV 在至少 95%的模拟中仍然是首选策略。
关于严重不良事件风险、对推荐的两剂方案的依从性以及复发性带状疱疹的概率,可用的数据很少。
与许多推荐的成人疫苗(包括 ZVL)相比,接种 RZV 的成本效益比更低。结果在广泛的合理价值范围内具有稳健性。
疾病控制和预防中心。