Hendricson William D, Andrieu Sandra C, Chadwick D Gregory, Chmar Jacqueline E, Cole James R, George Mary C, Glickman Gerald N, Glover Joel F, Goldberg Jerold S, Haden N Karl, Meyerowitz Cyril, Neumann Laura, Pyle Marsha, Tedesco Lisa A, Valachovic Richard W, Weaver Richard G, Winder Ronald L, Young Stephen K, Kalkwarf Kenneth L
San Antonio School of Dentistry, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2006 Sep;70(9):925-36.
This article was developed for the Commission on Change and Innovation in Dental Education (CCI), established by the American Dental Education Association. CCI was created because numerous organizations within organized dentistry and the educational community have initiated studies or proposed modifications to the process of dental education, often working to achieve positive and desirable goals but without coordination or communication. The fundamental mission of CCI is to serve as a focal meeting place where dental educators and administrators, representatives from organized dentistry, the dental licensure community, the Commission on Dental Accreditation, the ADA Council on Dental Education and Licensure, and the Joint Commission on National Dental Examinations can meet and coordinate efforts to improve dental education and the nation's oral health. One of the objectives of the CCI is to provide guidance to dental schools related to curriculum design. In pursuit of that objective, this article summarizes the evidence related to this question: What are educational best practices for helping dental students acquire the capacity to function as an entry-level general dentist or to be a better candidate to begin advanced studies? Three issues are addressed, with special emphasis on the third: 1) What constitutes expertise, and when does an individual become an expert? 2) What are the differences between novice and expert thinking? and 3) What educational best practices can help our students acquire mental capacities associated with expert function, including critical thinking and self-directed learning? The purpose of this review is to provide a benchmark that faculty and academic planners can use to assess the degree to which their curricula include learning experiences associated with development of problem-solving, critical thinking, self-directed learning, and other cognitive skills necessary for dental school graduates to ultimately become expert performers as they develop professionally in the years after graduation.
本文是为美国牙科教育协会设立的牙科教育变革与创新委员会(CCI)撰写的。设立CCI的原因是,牙科行业组织和教育界的众多机构纷纷开展研究或提议对牙科教育过程进行改革,这些工作往往旨在实现积极且理想的目标,但却缺乏协调与沟通。CCI的基本使命是成为一个核心会议场所,牙科教育工作者和管理人员、牙科行业组织代表、牙科执照颁发机构、牙科认证委员会、美国牙科协会牙科教育与执照颁发委员会以及国家牙科考试联合委员会可以在此汇聚一堂,共同协调努力,以改善牙科教育和国家的口腔健康状况。CCI的目标之一是为牙科学院提供课程设计方面的指导。为实现这一目标,本文总结了与以下问题相关的证据:帮助牙科学生具备初级全科牙医的执业能力或成为攻读高级学位的更佳人选的最佳教育实践是什么?本文探讨了三个问题,尤其侧重于第三个问题:1)什么构成专业知识,个人何时成为专家?2)新手思维与专家思维有何不同?3)哪些最佳教育实践可以帮助我们的学生获得与专家功能相关的思维能力,包括批判性思维和自主学习能力?本综述的目的是提供一个基准,教师和学术规划者可以据此评估其课程在多大程度上包含与培养解决问题、批判性思维、自主学习以及牙科学校毕业生在毕业后职业发展过程中最终成为专家型从业者所需的其他认知技能相关的学习经历。