Joniau Sander, Wong Ian, Rajapaksa Suresh, Carney Simon A, Wormald Peter-John
Department of Surgery-Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Adelaide and Flinders Universities, Adelaide, Australia.
Laryngoscope. 2006 Sep;116(9):1612-6. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000227999.76713.d3.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the results of powered turbinoplasty and to compare these with submucosal cauterization of the inferior turbinates.
Prospective, randomized, comparative surgical trial.
Nineteen patients with medication-resistant chronic nasal obstruction caused by inferior turbinate hypertrophy were randomized to undergo powered turbinoplasty on one side and submucosal cauterization on the other. For each side, an extensive assessment (symptom scoring, endoscopic scoring, and acoustic rhinometry) was recorded preoperatively and on week 1, week 3, month 3, year 1, and year 5 postoperatively.
Powered turbinoplasty was superior to submucosal cauterization on all aspects of the assessment. A significant difference (P < .05) was noted for postoperative crusting, endoscopical scoring of turbinate size, and acoustic rhinometry measurements of nasal cavity volume and mean area at the level of the nasal valve. In addition, the results of powered turbinoplasty were still apparent on long term follow-up, whereas submucosal cauterization was associated with a recurrence of turbinate hypertrophy.
Performing a powered turbinoplasty leads to decreased patient morbidity during the postoperative healing and to a better control of long-term results when compared with submucosal cauterization.
目的/假设:评估动力性鼻甲成形术的效果,并将其与下鼻甲黏膜下烧灼术进行比较。
前瞻性、随机、对照手术试验。
19例因下鼻甲肥大导致药物治疗无效的慢性鼻阻塞患者被随机分为两组,一侧接受动力性鼻甲成形术,另一侧接受黏膜下烧灼术。对每一侧,在术前以及术后第1周、第3周、第3个月、第1年和第5年记录广泛的评估结果(症状评分、内镜评分和声反射鼻测量)。
在评估的各个方面,动力性鼻甲成形术均优于黏膜下烧灼术。术后结痂、鼻甲大小的内镜评分以及鼻瓣膜水平鼻腔容积和平均面积的声反射鼻测量结果存在显著差异(P <.05)。此外,动力性鼻甲成形术的效果在长期随访中仍然明显,而黏膜下烧灼术与鼻甲肥大复发相关。
与黏膜下烧灼术相比,进行动力性鼻甲成形术可降低患者术后愈合期间的发病率,并能更好地控制长期效果。