van der Zwaard R
Meerkanten GGZ, Veldwijk Research Institute.
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2006;48(6):453-9.
The debate about dimensional or categorised classification ofsymptoms has widened to include the concept of delusions, one of the key notions in psychiatry. Although interrater agreement concerning the delusion concept is considerable, it is extremely doubtful whether approval also extends to the construct validity. Can the delusion concepts till be described according to the DSM-criteria?
To describe the history of the delusion concept and to present current views on the subject.
The literature was reviewed with the help ofPubMed.
A delusion can best be described as an individual and personal view which cannot befalsifted and to which patientsfeel emotionally attached. Most people consider a delusion to be implausible because it is expressed with such unshakeable certainty. With regard to a a dimension such as conviction there seems to be a continuum that extends from normal ideas to impaired reality-testing.
If delusions are to be considered as dimensional constructs this will give rise to questions concerning discriminant validity. It will become increasingly difficult to discriminate between delusions and other types of belief that are associated with impaired reality-testing.
关于症状的维度分类或类别分类的争论已经扩大,涵盖了妄想这一精神病学中的关键概念。尽管评估者之间关于妄想概念的一致性相当高,但这种认可是否也适用于结构效度却极其令人怀疑。妄想概念是否仍能根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)标准进行描述?
描述妄想概念的历史并呈现关于该主题的当前观点。
借助PubMed对文献进行综述。
妄想最好被描述为一种个人观点,这种观点无法被证伪,且患者在情感上对其有所依附。大多数人认为妄想难以置信,因为它以如此坚定不移的确定性表达出来。在信念等维度方面,似乎存在一个从正常想法到现实检验受损的连续体。
如果将妄想视为维度结构,这将引发有关区分效度的问题。区分妄想与其他与现实检验受损相关的信念类型将变得越来越困难。