Bell Vaughan, Halligan Peter W, Ellis Hadyn D
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, Psychology Department Box 78, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 May;10(5):219-26. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.004.
There is now considerable evidence for reasoning, attention, metacognition and attribution biases in delusional patients. Recently, these findings have been incorporated into a number of cognitive models that aim to explain delusion formation, maintenance and content. Although delusions are commonly conceptualized as beliefs, not all models make reference to models of normal belief formation. This review considers those models that explain delusions as a breakdown of normal belief formation (belief-positive models), approaches that explain the pathology only (belief-negative models) and approaches that view delusions as one end of a distribution of anomalous mental phenomena (the continuum view). A cognitive theory that includes the 'pragmatic pathology' of delusions will be able to address both the phenomenology and the treatment of delusion-related distress.
现在有大量证据表明妄想症患者存在推理、注意力、元认知和归因偏差。最近,这些发现已被纳入一些旨在解释妄想形成、维持和内容的认知模型中。尽管妄想通常被概念化为信念,但并非所有模型都参考正常信念形成的模型。本综述考虑了那些将妄想解释为正常信念形成障碍的模型(信念阳性模型)、仅解释病理的方法(信念阴性模型)以及将妄想视为异常心理现象分布一端的方法(连续体观点)。一个包含妄想“语用病理学”的认知理论将能够解决妄想相关痛苦的现象学和治疗问题。