Read S J, Levy J
Department of Neurology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2006 Oct;36(10):638-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01147.x.
Our previous work identified deficiencies in stroke care practices at regional hospitals in comparison to standards suggested by published stroke care guidelines. These deficiencies might be improved by the implementation of clinical pathways. The aim of this study was to assess changes in acute stroke care practices following the implementation of stroke care pathways at four regional Queensland hospitals.
The medical records of two cohorts of 120 patients with a discharge diagnosis of stroke or transient ischaemic attack were retrospectively audited before and after implementation of stroke care pathways to identify differences in the use of acute interventions, investigations and secondary prevention strategies.
Following pathway implementation there were clinically important, but not statistically significant, increases in the rates of swallow assessment, allied health assessment (significant for occupational therapy, P = 0.04) and use of deep vein thrombosis prevention strategies (also significant, P = 0.006). Fewer patients were discharged on no anti-thrombotic therapy (statistically significant in the subgroup of patients with atrial fibrillation, P = 0.02). Only 37% of the patients audited were actually enrolled on the pathway. Among this subgroup there were significant increases in the rates of swallow assessment (first 24 h, P = 0.01; any time during admission, P = 0.0001), allied health assessments (all P < 0.05), estimation of blood glucose level (P = 0.0015) and the use of deep vein thrombosis prevention strategies (P = 0.0003).
Stroke care pathways appear to improve the process of care. Whether this influences outcomes such as mortality, functional and neurological recovery, the incidence of complications, length of stay or the cost of care was beyond the scope of this study and will require further examination.
我们之前的研究发现,与已发表的卒中护理指南所建议的标准相比,地区医院的卒中护理实践存在不足。实施临床路径可能会改善这些不足。本研究的目的是评估昆士兰地区四家医院实施卒中护理路径后急性卒中护理实践的变化。
对两组各120例出院诊断为卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作的患者的病历进行回顾性审核,分别在实施卒中护理路径之前和之后,以确定急性干预措施、检查和二级预防策略使用方面的差异。
路径实施后,吞咽评估率、联合健康评估(职业治疗有显著差异,P = 0.04)和深静脉血栓形成预防策略的使用率均有临床意义上的增加,但无统计学显著性差异(同样显著,P = 0.006)。接受无抗血栓治疗出院的患者减少(在房颤患者亚组中有统计学显著性差异,P = 0.02)。接受审核的患者中只有37%实际纳入了该路径。在这个亚组中,吞咽评估率(最初24小时,P = 0.01;入院期间任何时间,P = 0.0001)、联合健康评估(所有P < 0.05)、血糖水平估计(P = 0.0015)和深静脉血栓形成预防策略的使用率(P = 0.0003)均有显著增加。
卒中护理路径似乎改善了护理过程。这是否会影响诸如死亡率、功能和神经恢复、并发症发生率、住院时间或护理成本等结果超出了本研究范围,需要进一步研究。